ReviewOchsner journal2014
Thirty years of intracrinology.
Review in Ochsner journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Central intracrine DHEA synthesis in ageing-related neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration: therapeutic potential?Journal of neuroinflammation · 2018Review
- Anti-Müllerian Hormone Signaling Regulates Epithelial Plasticity and Chemoresistance in Lung Cancer.Cell reports · 2016Article
- Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Intracrine Biology: An Hypothesis.Ochsner journal · 2016Review
- Recent Publications by Ochsner Authors.Ochsner journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntracrinology is the study of the intracellular actions, regulation, trafficking, and interactions of extracellular signaling peptides/proteins.
methodsWe describe the development of intracrine biology since the term was defined in 1984.
resultsIntracrine biology plays a role in many normal and pathological processes and represents a fertile field for the development of novel therapeutics.
conclusionAlthough 30 years old, the field of intracrinology is only now becoming widely accepted. Intracrine principles can be applied to the investigation of physiological processes and to the development of new therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25598734PMC4295746What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.