ReviewJournal of minimal access surgery
Robotic surgery in gynecology.
Review in Journal of minimal access surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thymectomy via open surgery or robotic video assisted thoracic surgery: Can a recommendation already be made?Medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Single-incision robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with the EDGE SP1000 robotic system at a Shanghai center.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Experiential learning in urologic single-port robotic surgery transition training: a qualitative descriptive study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Open Adenomyomectomy: Comparative Surgical and Reproductive Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Approaches: Comparative Learning Curves and Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus V-NOTES Techniques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Single-port robotic surgery in gynecology: first experience in German-speaking countries using the Da Vinci SP system in benign andneoplastic diseases.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Comparative clinical efficacy of three surgical modalities for the treatment of malignant tumours of the left hemicolon.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Surgical efficiency for gynecological surgery with a single robotic console: the value of the surgical team and robotic technology in maximizing efficiency on intensive surgical days: a comprehensive analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Ovarian Reserve After Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Single-Site Ovarian Cystectomy for Mature Cystic Teratoma: A Prospective Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Robotic Rectus Abdominis Myoperitoneal Flap for Posterior Vaginal Wall Reconstruction: Experience at a Single Institution.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Novel Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- An eight-year analysis of robotic surgery in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer in a tertiary center in Singapore.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024Article
- Is It the Best Option? Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Two New Techniques Complementing Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy: Coaxial Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy vs. Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Exploring the Evolution of Robotic Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives.Cureus · 2024Review
- Robotic Surgery in Gynaecology: A Retrospective Evaluation of an Experience at a Single Centre.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2024Article
- Advancements in Robotic Surgery: A Comprehensive Overview of Current Utilizations and Upcoming Frontiers.Cureus · 2023Review
- Short-term outcomes and costs analysis of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a retrospective single-center analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in comparing laparoscopic versus robotic abdominopelvic surgeries.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Robot-assisted and conventional urology surgical procedures: comparison of average length of stay, economic status, operative time and patient's expenditure in a tertiary care hospital of North India.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
FDA approved Da Vinci Surgical System in 2005 for gynecological surgery. It has been rapidly adopted and it has already assumed an important position at various centers where this is available. It comprises of three components: A surgeon's console, a patient-side cart with four robotic arms and a high-definition three-dimensional (3D) vision system. In this review we have discussed various robotic-assisted laparoscopic benign gynecological procedures like myomectomy, hysterectomy, endometriosis, tubal anastomosis and sacrocolpopexy. A PubMed search was done and relevant published studies were reviewed. Surgeries that can have future applications are also mentioned. At present most studies do not give significant advantage over conventional laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecological disease. However robotics do give an edge in more complex surgeries. The conversion rate to open surgery is lesser with robotic assistance when compared to laparoscopy. For myomectomy surgery, Endo wrist movement of robotic instrument allows better and precise suturing than conventional straight stick laparoscopy. The robotic platform is a logical step forward to laparoscopy and if cost considerations are addressed may become popular among gynecological surgeons world over.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.