Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25598335›Full record

ArticleFuture microbiology2015

Engineering yeast for producing human glycoproteins: where are we now?

Bram Laukens, Charlotte De Visscher, Nico Callewaert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Expression of Tailored α-N-Acetylglucosaminidase inBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. ExploringMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2021
    Review
  9. Yeasts as Biopharmaceutical Production Platforms.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. EngineeringRSC advances · 2019
    Article
  15. Production and Purification of Therapeutic Enzymes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Production of RecombinantEnzyme research · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genetic glycoengineering in mammalian cells.The Journal of biological chemistry
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bram LaukensUnit for Medical Biotechnology, Inflammation Research Centre (IRC), VIB-UGent, Technologiepark 927, B-9052 Ghent-Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Charlotte De Visscher
Nico Callewaert

Funding

European Research Council 616966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yeast has advanced as an alternative for mammalian cell culture for the production of recombinant therapeutic glycoproteins. Engineered yeast strains not only allow to mimic the human N-glycosylation pathway but also specific types of human O-glycosylation. This is of great value for therapeutic protein production and indispensable to determine the structure-function relationships of glycans on recombinant proteins. However, as the technology matures, some limitations have come up that may hamper biomedical applications and must be considered to exploit the full potential of the unprecedented glycan homogeneity obtained on relevant biopharmaceuticals. In this special report, we focus on the recent developments in N- and O-glycosylation engineering in yeasts of industrial importance, to produce recombinant therapeutics with customized glycans.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringGlycoproteinsGlycosylationHumansOrganisms, Genetically ModifiedPolysaccharidesRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeYeastsGlycoproteinsPolysaccharidesRecombinant ProteinsN-glycosylation engineeringO-glycosylation engineeringPichia pastorisSaccharomyces cerevisiaetherapeutic proteinsyeast

Identifiers

PMID25598335
PMCPMC7617146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.