Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25598308›Full record

ReviewLab on a chip2015

Microfluidic cell sorting: a review of the advances in the separation of cells from debulking to rare cell isolation.

C Wyatt Shields, Catherine D Reyes, Gabriel P López

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lab on a chip, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 289 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
289citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
56.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

289 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,007 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Virtual ultrasound machine operating in a GHz to MHz frequency range for particle-based biomedical simulations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Separation of intrinsically magnetic cells using magnetic filters.Separation and purification technology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

229 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C Wyatt ShieldsNSF Research Triangle Materials Research Science and Engineering Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. gabriel.lopez@duke.edu.
Catherine D Reyes
Gabriel P López
Triangle · USDurham Technical Community College · US

Funding

An Instrument for Negative Acoustic Contrast Bead-based Cell Sorting and StainingR21GM111584 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YELLEN, BENJAMIN BIRON · 2014 to 2016
$544k
NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM111584NIGMS NIH HHS R21GM111584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and high throughput cell sorting is a critical enabling technology in molecular and cellular biology, biotechnology, and medicine. While conventional methods can provide high efficiency sorting in short timescales, advances in microfluidics have enabled the realization of miniaturized devices offering similar capabilities that exploit a variety of physical principles. We classify these technologies as either active or passive. Active systems generally use external fields (e.g., acoustic, electric, magnetic, and optical) to impose forces to displace cells for sorting, whereas passive systems use inertial forces, filters, and adhesion mechanisms to purify cell populations. Cell sorting on microchips provides numerous advantages over conventional methods by reducing the size of necessary equipment, eliminating potentially biohazardous aerosols, and simplifying the complex protocols commonly associated with cell sorting. Additionally, microchip devices are well suited for parallelization, enabling complete lab-on-a-chip devices for cellular isolation, analysis, and experimental processing. In this review, we examine the breadth of microfluidic cell sorting technologies, while focusing on those that offer the greatest potential for translation into clinical and industrial practice and that offer multiple, useful functions. We organize these sorting technologies by the type of cell preparation required (i.e., fluorescent label-based sorting, bead-based sorting, and label-free sorting) as well as by the physical principles underlying each sorting mechanism.

Indexed as

AcousticsCell SeparationFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesHumansHydrodynamicsMagneticsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID25598308
PMCPMC4331226
OpenAlexW2018050443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.