SynthesisBMC medicine2015
Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis addressing the impact of cardiovascular-acting medication on peak oxygen uptake of patients with HFpEF.Heart failure reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on cardiac function in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Heart failure reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pharmacological treatments for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction-a systematic review and indirect comparison.Heart failure reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Review
- The effects of SGLT2i on cardiac metabolism in patients with HFpEF: Fact or fiction?Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
- Aldosterone Effect on Cardiac Structure and Function.Current cardiology reviews · 2024Review
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor in Smooth Muscle Contributes to Pressure Overload-Induced Heart Failure.Circulation. Heart failure · 2021Article
- State-of-the-Art Review of Current Therapies for HFpEF: An Overview of Interatrial Septal Device Therapy in Heart Failure.Current cardiology reviews · 2021Review
- Natriuretic Peptides in Heart Failure with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: From Molecular Evidences to Clinical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- Biomarkers of Inflammation in Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction.Disease markers · 2019Review
- Role of spironolactone in the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Review
- Current Management and Future Directions of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Contemporary Review.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2018Review
- Spironolactone for Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Whither to After TOPCAT?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2015Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to be effective in patients with heart failure or myocardial infarction complicated by a reduced ejection fraction. However, the role of MRAs in patients with preserved ejection fraction (PEF) remains to be clarified. We aimed to summarize the evidence for the efficacy of MRAs in patients with either heart failure with PEF (HF-PEF) or myocardial infarction with PEF (MI-PEF).
methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinical trials databases for randomized controlled trials, through June 2014, assessing MRA treatment in HF-PEF or MI-PEF patients. Fourteen randomized controlled trials (MI-PEF, 5; HF-PEF, 9; n = 6,428 patients) were included.
resultsMRA treatment reduced the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (relative risk, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 0.98), improved quality of life (weighted mean difference [WMD], -5.16; 95% CI, -8.03 to -2.30), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (standardized mean difference, -0.21; 95% CI, 0.32 to -0.11), and serum amino-terminal peptide of procollagen type-III level (WMD, -1.50, 95% CI, -1.72 to -1.29) in patients with PEF. In addition, MRAs reduced E/e'(an echocardiographic estimate of filling pressure for assessment of diastolic function; WMD, -1.82; 95% CI, -2.23 to -1.42) in HF-PEF patients and E/A ratio (the ratio of early to late diastolic transmitral flow; WMD, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.14) in MI-PEF patients. However, all-cause mortality was not improved by MRAs in either HF-PEF (P = 0.90) or MI-PEF (P = 0.27) patients.
conclusionsMRA treatment in PEF patients led to reduced hospitalization for heart failure, quantifiable improvements in quality of life and diastolic function, and reversal of cardiac remodeling, but did not provide any all-cause mortality benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.