Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25597792›Full record

ArticleJournal of renal care2015

Continuing education: preparing patients to choose a renal replacement therapy.

Tony Goovaerts, Corinne Bagnis Isnard, Carlo Crepaldi, Jessica Dean, Stefan Melander, Andrew Mooney, Mario Prieto-Velasco, Carmen Trujillo, Roberto Zambon, Eva-Lena Nilsson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of renal care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Tony GoovaertsCliniques Universitaires St Luc, Service de Néphrologie, Brussels, Belgium.
Corinne Bagnis Isnard
Carlo Crepaldi
Jessica Dean
Stefan Melander
Andrew Mooney
Mario Prieto-Velasco
Carmen Trujillo
Roberto Zambon
Eva-Lena Nilsson
Ospedale San Bortolo · ITCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia · ESHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ESLinköping University Hospital · SESalford Royal Hospital · GBSkåne University Hospital · SESorbonne Université · FRSt James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with progressive chronic kidney disease face a series of treatment decisions that will impact the quality of life of themselves and their family. Renal replacement therapy option education (RRTOE), generally provided by nurses, is recommended by international guidelines

objectivesTo provide nurses with advice and guidance on running RRTOE.

designA consensus conference.

participantsFour nurses, 5 nephrologists and 1 clinical psychologist (9 renal units; 6 European countries) from units that had extensive experience in RRTOE or were performing research in this field. APPROACH: Experts brainstormed and discussed quality standards for the education team, processes, content/topics, media/material/funding and quality measurements for RRTOE.

resultsConclusions and recommendations from these discussions that are particularly pertinent to nurses are presented in this paper.

conclusionsThrough careful planning and smooth interdisciplinary cooperation, it is possible to implement an education and support programme that helps patients choose a form of RRT that is most suited to their needs. This may result in benefits in quality of life and clinical outcomes. APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: There are large differences between renal units in terms of resources available and the demographics of the catchment area. Therefore, nurses should carefully consider how best to adapt the advice offered here to their own situation. Throughout this process, it is crucial to keep in mind the ultimate goal - providing patients with the knowledge and skill to make a modality choice that will enhance their quality of life to the greatest degree.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorEducation, Nursing, ContinuingNurse-Patient RelationsBelgiumConsensus Statements as TopicHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationPatient Education as TopicQuality Assurance, Health CareRenal Replacement TherapyeducationEnd-stage kidney diseasepredialysisrenal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID25597792
PMCPMC7328707
OpenAlexW1955761239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.