ArticleClinical rheumatology2015
Decrease of LL-37 in systemic sclerosis: a new marker for interstitial lung disease?
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mediators of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD): systematic review and meta-analyses.Thorax · 2023Pooled it
- Cord blood antimicrobial peptide LL37 levels in preterm neonates and association with preterm complications.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Role of Alarmins in the Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Article
- Serum concentrations of antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin LL-37 in patients with bacterial lung infections.Central-European journal of immunology · 2018Article
- Endogenous antimicrobial factors in the treatment of infectious diseases.Central-European journal of immunology · 2016Review
- Evaluation of plasma antimicrobial peptide LL-37 and nuclear factor-kappaB levels in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of systemic sclerosis (SSc) related morbidity and mortality. LL-37 peptide is the only cathelicidin of the human antimicrobial peptide family with antimicrobial effects and immunomodulatory activity. LL-37 has anti-fibrotic effects and anti-apoptotic effects on SSc dermal fibroblasts. The aim of the study was to investigate the circulating levels of LL-37 in SSc patients and its association with clinical, laboratory, and instrumental parameters. Fifty-eight SSc patients (30 with and 28 without pulmonary involvement) and 28 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Pulmonary involvement was defined when ILD was found at HRCT (ground glass, reticular, and honeycombing pattern). Circulating LL-37 levels were measured with ELISA test. In SSc patients with ILD serum, LL-37 concentrations were remarkably lower (1.36 mg/ml) than those in SSc patients without ILD (4.62 ng/ml, p = 0.035) and controls (5.53 ng/ml, p = 0.009). In SSc patients without ILD, serum LL-37 levels were not different from controls (p = 0.812). No significant association or correlation was found between LL-37 levels and any other clinical, serological, or instrumental features. Serum LL-37 levels are significantly lower in patients with SSc ILD. Our results may suggest that lower LL-37 levels may be associated with the development of ILD. Whether circulating levels of LL-37 might be used as an indirect marker of ILD remains to be determined in larger SSc cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.