Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25597445›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2015

Incorporating relaxivities to more accurately reconstruct MR images.

Muge Karaman, Iain P Bruce, Daniel B Rowe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muge KaramanCenter for MR Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Iain P BruceDuke/UNC Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Daniel B RoweDepartment of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. Electronic address: daniel.rowe@marquette.edu.

Funding

Improving f(c)MRI Accuracy by Accounting for the Implications of Data ProcessingR21NS087450 · NINDS · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI ROWE, DANIEL B · 2014 to 2015
$386k
NINDS NIH HHS NS087450NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS087450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a mathematical model that incorporates the magnetic resonance relaxivities into the image reconstruction process in a single step. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn magnetic resonance imaging, the complex-valued measurements of the acquired signal at each point in frequency space are expressed as a Fourier transformation of the proton spin density weighted by Fourier encoding anomalies: T2(⁎), T1, and a phase determined by magnetic field inhomogeneity (∆B) according to the MR signal equation. Such anomalies alter the expected symmetry and the signal strength of the k-space observations, resulting in images distorted by image warping, blurring, and loss in image intensity. Although T1 on tissue relaxation time provides valuable quantitative information on tissue characteristics, the T1 recovery term is typically neglected by assuming a long repetition time. In this study, the linear framework presented in the work of Rowe et al., 2007, and of Nencka et al., 2009 is extended to develop a Fourier reconstruction operation in terms of a real-valued isomorphism that incorporates the effects of T2(⁎), ∆B, and T1. This framework provides a way to precisely quantify the statistical properties of the corrected image-space data by offering a linear relationship between the observed frequency space measurements and reconstructed corrected image-space measurements. The model is illustrated both on theoretical data generated by considering T2(⁎), T1, and/or ∆B effects, and on experimentally acquired fMRI data by focusing on the incorporation of T1. A comparison is also made between the activation statistics computed from the reconstructed data with and without the incorporation of T1 effects.

resultAccounting for T1 effects in image reconstruction is shown to recover image contrast that exists prior to T1 equilibrium. The incorporation of T1 is also shown to induce negligible correlation in reconstructed images and preserve functional activations.

conclusionWith the use of the proposed method, the effects of T2(⁎) and ∆B can be corrected, and T1 can be incorporated into the time series image-space data during image reconstruction in a single step. Incorporation of T1 provides improved tissue segmentation over the course of time series and therefore can improve the precision of motion correction and image registration.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityCorrectionFunctional MRI (fMRI)Image reconstructionLongitudinal relaxation time (T(1))Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)MR relaxivities

Identifiers

PMID25597445
PMCPMC4520298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.