ReviewAbdominal imaging2015
Recent advances in image-guided targeted prostate biopsy.
Review in Abdominal imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of cognitive magnetic resonance-ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy outcomes in left lateral decubitus vs lithotomy positions: a prospective randomized study cognitive magnetic resonance-ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy.International urology and nephrology · 2025Trial
- Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy for PI-RADS ≥3 peripheral zone lesions in multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinically significant prostate cancer.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Initial pain score during viscous lidocaine instillation and clinical characteristics as predictors of overall pain in fusion prostate biopsy.Journal of biological methods · 2025Article
- Recent Advancements in CT and MR Imaging of Prostate Cancer.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2022Review
- Deep learning-based artificial intelligence for prostate cancer detection at biparametric MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- Deep learning-based artificial intelligence applications in prostate MRI: brief summary.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Comparison of Accuracies between Real-Time Nonrigid and Rigid Registration in the MRI-US Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Alterations in protein expression and site-specific N-glycosylation of prostate cancer tissues.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Precise Identification of Prostate Cancer from DWI Using Transfer Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- An external validation of the Candiolo nomogram in a cohort of prostate cancer patients treated by external-beam radiotherapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021Article
- Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
- Prostate cancer detection from multi-institution multiparametric MRIs using deep convolutional neural networks.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2018Article
- Computer-aided diagnosis prior to conventional interpretation of prostate mpMRI: an international multi-reader study.European radiology · 2018Article
- All over the map: An interobserver agreement study of tumor location based on the PI-RADSv2 sector map.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018Article
- Cognitive-Targeted versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Prostate Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Detection.Current urology · 2018Article
- Future Perspectives and Challenges of Prostate MR Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2018Review
- The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.Radiology · 2017Review
- Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer with MRI.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2017Article
- Computer-aided Detection of Prostate Cancer with MRI: Technology and Applications.Academic radiology · 2016Review
- Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a common malignancy in the United States that results in over 30,000 deaths per year. The current state of prostate cancer diagnosis, based on PSA screening and sextant biopsy, has been criticized for both overdiagnosis of low-grade tumors and underdiagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancers (Gleason score ≥7). Recently, image guidance has been added to perform targeted biopsies of lesions detected on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans. These methods have improved the ability to detect clinically significant cancer, while reducing the diagnosis of low-grade tumors. Several approaches have been explored to improve the accuracy of image-guided targeted prostate biopsy, including in-bore MRI-guided, cognitive fusion, and MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy. This review will examine recent advances in these image-guided targeted prostate biopsy techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.