ReviewTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2015
Everolimus-based combination for the treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs): biological rationale and critical review of published data.
Review in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation between clinicopathological characteristics and the clinical prognosis of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Outcomes of non-metastatic poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms treated with surgery: a real-world population-based study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
- Immunotherapy in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Where Are We Now?Current treatment options in oncology · 2021Review
- Kinase-targeted cancer therapies: progress, challenges and future directions.Molecular cancer · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) comprise a heterogeneous group of diseases. Advanced GEP-NENs are considered distinct disease entity with limited treatments. In this review, we will explore the biological rationale and clinical data of everolimus-based combinations for advanced GEP-NENs. PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched using the terms "GEP-NENs" and "everolimus" and "systemic therapy" and selecting English literature only. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival and overall survival (PFS and OS), toxicities, and tumor response. A total of 14 potentially relevant trials were initially identified, of which five studies were excluded. Hence, nine trials including 699 patients were included. Median PFS was reported in four out of the nine studies ranging from 14.6 to 16.4 months. The disease control rate was reported in all studies, and it ranged from 75 to 93%. Frequently reported grade 3/4 toxicities were elevated transaminases, hyperglycemia, and hematologic toxicities. The presence of clinical and statistical heterogeneity of the primary studies precludes reliable evidence-based conclusions. Further well-conducted randomized controlled trials are awaited to better evaluate the treatment of GEP-NENs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25596701What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.