Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25596196›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Establishment of a prospective cohort of mechanically ventilated patients in five intensive care units in Lima, Peru: protocol and organisational characteristics of participating centres.

Joshua A Denney, Francesca Capanni, Phabiola Herrera, Augusto Dulanto, Rollin Roldan, Enrique Paz, Amador A Jaymez, Eduardo E Chirinos, Jose Portugal, Rocio Quispe and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Joshua A DenneyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Francesca CapanniDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Phabiola HerreraDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Augusto DulantoBiomedical Research Unit, Asociación Benéfica PRISMA, Lima, Peru.
Rollin RoldanServicio De Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru.
Enrique PazServicio De Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, Lima, Peru.
Amador A JaymezServicio De Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza, Lima, Peru.
Eduardo E ChirinosServicio De Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital De Emergencias José Casimiro Ulloa, Lima, Peru.
Jose PortugalServicio De Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru.
Rocio QuispeServicio De Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru.
Roy G BrowerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
William CheckleyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA Program in Global Disease Epidemiology and Control, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
INTENSIVOS Cohort Study

Funding

Acute Lung Injury: Application of Novel Approaches to Longitudinal Data AnalysisR00HL096955 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHECKLEY, WILLIAM · 2011 to 2013
$723k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL096955NHLBI NIH HHS R00HL096955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMechanical ventilation is a cornerstone in the management of critically ill patients worldwide; however, less is known about the clinical management of mechanically ventilated patients in low and middle income countries where limitation of resources including equipment, staff and access to medical information may play an important role in defining patient-centred outcomes. We present the design of a prospective, longitudinal study of mechanically ventilated patients in Peru that aims to describe a large cohort of mechanically ventilated patients and identify practices that, if modified, could result in improved patient-centred outcomes and lower costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Five Peruvian intensive care units (ICUs) and the Medical ICU at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were selected for this study. Eligible patients were those who underwent at least 24 h of invasive mechanical ventilation within the first 48 h of admission into the ICU. Information on ventilator settings, clinical management and treatment were collected daily for up to 28 days or until the patient was discharged from the unit. Vital status was assessed at 90 days post enrolment. A subset of participants who survived until hospital discharge were asked to participate in an ancillary study to assess vital status, and physical and mental health at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months after hospitalisation, Primary outcomes include 90-day mortality, time on mechanical ventilation, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, and prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome. In subsequent analyses, we aim to identify interventions and standardised care strategies that can be tailored to resource-limited settings and that result in improved patient-centred outcomes and lower costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We obtained ethics approval from each of the four participating hospitals in Lima, Peru, and at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. Results will be disseminated as several separate publications in different international journals.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesCritical IllnessDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayLongitudinal StudiesMalePeruProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialEPIDEMIOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID25596196
PMCPMC4298097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.