ArticleNanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine2015
Analysis of human innate immune responses to PRINT fabricated nanoparticles with cross validation using a humanized mouse model.
Article in Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precise nanoscale fabrication technologies, the "last mile" of medicinal development.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Power in Numbers: Harnessing Combinatorial and Integrated Screens to Advance Nanomedicine.JACS Au · 2022Review
- Lessons learned from immunological characterization of nanomaterials at the Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Materials design at the interface of nanoparticles and innate immunity.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2016Article
- Clinical experiences with systemically administered siRNA-based therapeutics in cancer.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2015Review
- Towards programming immune tolerance through geometric manipulation of phosphatidylserine.Biomaterials · 2015Article
- Rapid and Persistent Delivery of Antigen by Lymph Node Targeting PRINT Nanoparticle Vaccine Carrier To Promote Humoral Immunity.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ideal nanoparticle (NP)-based drug and vaccine delivery vectors should be free of inherent cytotoxic or immunostimulatory properties. Therefore, determining baseline immune responses to nanomaterials is of utmost importance when designing human therapeutics. We characterized the response of human immune cells to hydrogel NPs fabricated using Particle Replication in Non-wetting Templates (PRINT) technology. We found preferential NP uptake by primary CD14(+) monocytes, which was significantly reduced upon PEGylation of the NP surface. Multiplex cytokine analysis of NP treated primary human peripheral blood mononuclear cells suggests that PRINT based hydrogel NPs do not evoke significant inflammatory responses nor induce cytotoxicity or complement activation. We furthered these studies using an in vivo humanized mouse model and similarly found preferential NP uptake by human CD14(+) monocytes without systemic inflammatory cytokine responses. These studies suggest that PRINT hydrogel particles form a desirable platform for vaccine and drug delivery as they neither induce inflammation nor toxicity. From the clinical editor: The authors here fabricated hydrogel nanorods using the PRINT (Particle Replication In Nonwetting Templates) fabrication process. They tested the interaction of human immune cells with these particles and found no immunoreactivity. This finding would suggest that monodisperse PRINT particles of identical shape and size could serve a variety of clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.