Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25595921›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2015

[Multidisciplinary outpatient care program vs. usual care : Cost-benefit analysis in patients with chronic low back pain].

J Brömme, M Mohokum, A C Disch, U Marnitz

Abstract readComparative StudyControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Multimodal pain therapy. Current situation].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J BrömmePark-Klinik Weissensee, Schönstr. 80, 13086, Berlin, Deutschland, broemme@park-klinik.com.
M Mohokum
A C Disch
U Marnitz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major health problem in industrialized nations and is associated with very high total costs. These costs are split between direct costs brought about by the utilization of health care services and indirect costs due to back pain-related loss of productivity. Despite the existence of some evidence about the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary outpatient care programmes in Germany, the economic benefit of these programmes has not yet been studied in detail.

objectiveTo provide an economic evaluation of the cost benefits of a multidisciplinary outpatient care programme for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) compared to those undergoing conventional care. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn economic evaluation was performed in 514 patients who have been diagnosed with LBP. Two interventions will be compared: (1) a multidisciplinary outpatient care programme consisting of education, activity programmes, cognitive behavioural therapy, work hardening and functional restoration and (2) the usual noninvasive care provided by medical specialists and health care professionals. In all, 257 patients were involved in a 4 week multidisciplinary outpatient care programme, while the other 257 were subject to conventional care.

resultsThe total costs per patient were estimated to be <euro>10,584.14 (±<euro> 9,730.87) after 1 year in the group with the multidisciplinary care programme. The results show a significant reduction in the total amount of costs <euro>3,161.63 (range <euro>2,845.30-3,477.96) compared to the usual care group. However, the direct costs are minor (6-12%) compared to the indirect costs (80-93%).

conclusionThis study provides important information which is of value for decision-making and making an adequate allocation of medical resources for patients with CLBP. A multidisciplinary outpatient care programme can facilitate rapid return to work.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationAdultAmbulatory CareCombined Modality TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMatched-Pair AnalysisMiddle AgedWorkers' Compensation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.