Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25595827›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2016

Management of the axilla: has Z0011 had an impact?

D P Joyce, A J Lowery, L B McGrath-Soo, E Downey, L Kelly, G T O'Donoghue, M Barry, A D K Hill

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

D P JoyceDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland. doireann.joyce@gmail.com.
A J LoweryDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
L B McGrath-SooDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
E DowneyDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
L KellyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
G T O'DonoghueDepartment of Breast Surgery, Waterford Regional Hospital, Waterford, Ireland.
M BarryDepartment of Breast Surgery, Mater Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland.
A D K HillDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Beaumont Hospital · IECork University Hospital · IEMater Misericordiae University Hospital · IEUniversity Hospital Waterford · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of axillary disease in breast cancer has evolved significantly over the last two decades with the introduction of SLNB and a trend towards less radical surgery. Data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial proposes that not all patients with positive axillary lymph nodes require completion axillary dissection.

aimsThe aim of this study was to determine whether there has been a change in practice patterns for axillary management in Ireland since the publication of this 'practice-changing' trial.

methodsA review of breast cancers managed in the 12 months prior to publication of Z0011 (pre-Z0011) and comparison with those managed in the following 12 months (post-Z0011) was undertaken in three tertiary referral breast cancer centres. Patients with a positive SLNB were identified, and clinicopathologic data and subsequent management was compared between the two cohorts.

resultsThere were 708 SLNB performed during the study period; 326 pre-Z0011 and 382 post-Z0011. There was no difference in the rate of SLN positivity between the two cohorts: 29.1 % had a positive SLN pre-Z0011 and 29.3 % were positive post-Z0011. There were a significantly lower number of axillary clearances performed in SLN-positive patients in the post-Z0011 period (71.4 %) compared to the pre-Z011 period (93.7 %, p = 0.0022 Chi-square). Of the patients with tumour characteristics meeting the Z0011 inclusion criteria in the initial 12 months of the study, 92.3 % underwent ALND compared with 65.6 % in the final 12 months of the study (p = 0.0006 Chi-square).

conclusionsThere has been a change in clinical practice since the publication of the Z0011 trial, illustrated by a decrease in the rate of axillary clearance in node-positive breast cancers.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAgedAxillaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisIrelandLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyACOSOG Z0011AxillaAxillary lymph node dissectionBreast cancerSentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID25595827
OpenAlexW2051910124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.