Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25595771›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Elizabethkingia anophelis: molecular manipulation and interactions with mosquito hosts.

Shicheng Chen, Michael Bagdasarian, Edward D Walker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microbiota variation inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  16. Characterization of the Tissue and Strain-Specific Microbiota ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shicheng ChenDeparment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA shicheng@msu.edu.
Michael BagdasarianDeparment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Edward D WalkerDeparment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Larval Mosquito Feeding and Microbial InteractionsR37AI021884 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WALKER, EDWARD D · 2008 to 2017
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI021884NIAID NIH HHS R37AI21884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flavobacteria (members of the family Flavobacteriaceae) dominate the bacterial community in the Anopheles mosquito midgut. One such commensal, Elizabethkingia anophelis, is closely associated with Anopheles mosquitoes through transstadial persistence (i.e., from one life stage to the next); these and other properties favor its development for paratransgenic applications in control of malaria parasite transmission. However, the physiological requirements of E. anophelis have not been investigated, nor has its capacity to perpetuate despite digestion pressure in the gut been quantified. To this end, we first developed techniques for genetic manipulation of E. anophelis, including selectable markers, reporter systems (green fluorescent protein [GFP] and NanoLuc), and transposons that function in E. anophelis. A flavobacterial expression system based on the promoter PompA was integrated into the E. anophelis chromosome and showed strong promoter activity to drive GFP and NanoLuc reporter production. Introduced, GFP-tagged E. anophelis associated with mosquitoes at successive developmental stages and propagated in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles stephensi but not in Aedes triseriatus mosquitoes. Feeding NanoLuc-tagged cells to A. gambiae and A. stephensi in the larval stage led to infection rates of 71% and 82%, respectively. In contrast, a very low infection rate (3%) was detected in Aedes triseriatus mosquitoes under the same conditions. Of the initial E. anophelis cells provided to larvae, 23%, 71%, and 85% were digested in A. stephensi, A. gambiae, and Aedes triseriatus, respectively, demonstrating that E. anophelis adapted to various mosquito midgut environments differently. Bacterial cell growth increased up to 3-fold when arginine was supplemented in the defined medium. Furthermore, the number of NanoLuc-tagged cells in A. stephensi significantly increased when arginine was added to a sugar diet, showing it to be an important amino acid for E. anophelis. Animal erythrocytes promoted E. anophelis growth in vivo and in vitro, indicating that this bacterium could obtain nutrients by participating in erythrocyte lysis in the mosquito midgut.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsAedesAnimalsAnophelesFlavobacteriaceaeGastrointestinal TractGenes, ReporterGenetics, MicrobialLarvaLuminescent ProteinsMolecular BiologyMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNALuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25595771
PMCPMC4345385
OpenAlexW1997030872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.