Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25595418›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Helminth control in kennels: is the combination of milbemycin oxime and praziquantel a right choice?

Laura Rinaldi, Saverio Pennacchio, Vincenzo Musella, Maria Paola Maurelli, Francesco La Torre, Giuseppe Cringoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura RinaldiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Naples, Regione Campania, Italy. lrinaldi@unina.it.
Saverio PennacchioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Naples, Regione Campania, Italy. saverio.pennacchio@unina.it.
Vincenzo MusellaDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Græcia, Catanzaro, Italy. musella@unicz.it.
Maria Paola MaurelliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Naples, Regione Campania, Italy. mariapaola.maurelli@unina.it.
Francesco La TorreNovartis Animal Health, Rome, Italy. francesco.la_torre@novartis.com.
Giuseppe CringoliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Naples, Regione Campania, Italy. cringoli@unina.it.
Regione Campania · ITMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Teramo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKennel dogs are at the high risk of infections with intestinal and extra-intestinal helminths. Therefore, regular parasitological surveillance, appropriate treatment strategies and high quality standard of hygiene are required to guarantee the health and welfare of kennel dogs. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of helminth control in kennels using different broad-spectrum anthelmintics that are routinely used in canine veterinary practice. Particular attention was given to the field efficacy and ease-of-use of each product.

methodsThe study was conducted in 3 public kennels in the Campania region (southern Italy). Eighteen boxes from each of the three kennels were selected for treatment based on faecal egg counts (FECs) at Day -30. The treatments were conducted using tablets containing combinations of: i) milbemycin oxime and praziquantel (Milbemax®); ii) pyrantel embonate, febantel and praziquantel (Drontal Plus Flavour®), and; iii) pyrantel pamoate, oxantel pamoate and praziquantel (Nemex® POP). All dogs were treated on Day 0 and sampled on Days 0, 7, 14 and 21 for copromicroscopic analyses. The FLOTAC dual technique on pooled samples was used with efficacy determined by reduction in FECs.

resultsAt Day -30 intestinal nematodes (hookworms, Toxocara, Trichuris) and cestodes (Dypilidium caninum) were found. Milbemax® showed 100% efficacy against all the helminths in all the kennels. Drontal Plus Flavour® was 100% effective against hookworms in all the kennels but gave lower efficacy against T. canis (range=97.1-100%) and T. vulpis (range=95.6-100%). Nemex® POP was also 100% effective against hookworms in all kennels but less effective against T. canis (range=95.7-100%) and T. vulpis (range=95.7-100%). All three drugs were 100% effective against D.caninum.

conclusionsMilbemax®was fully effective against all the helminthes and was palatable and ease-of-use for all the dogs. It is the optimum choice for the treatment and prevention of helminth infections in kennel dogs under field conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthelminticsDog DiseasesDogsDrug CombinationsFemaleHelminthiasis, AnimalHousing, AnimalItalyMacrolidesMalePraziquantelAnthelminticsDrug CombinationsMacrolidesmilbemycin oximePraziquantel

Identifiers

PMID25595418
PMCPMC4304623
OpenAlexW1998112380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.