Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25595413›Full record

Trial reportManual therapy2015

Immediate changes in pressure pain sensitivity after thoracic spinal manipulative therapy in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled study.

Joseph R Kardouni, Scott W Shaffer, Peter E Pidcoe, Sheryl D Finucane, Seth A Cheatham, Lori A Michener

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Manual therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06110039 (Comparative Effects of Cervicothoracic Junction Mobilization With Arm Movements and Upper Thoracic Manipulation in Patients With Subachromial Impinegment Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06110039 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Cervicothoracic Junction Mobilization With Arm Movements and Upper Thoracic Manipulation in Patients With Subachromial Impinegment Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsSubacromial Impingement SyndromeArmsCervicothoracic Junction Mobilization, Upper Thoracic Spine Manipulation:
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Manual Therapy Effect in Placebo-Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Manual therapy and exercise for rotator cuff disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Effect of thoracic mobilization on acromio-humeral distance, thoracic kyphosis angle, pain and shoulder function in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph R KardouniTotal Army Injury and Health Outcomes Database (TAIHOD) Research Team, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA, USA. Electronic address: joseph.r.kardouni.mil@mail.mil.
Scott W ShafferU.S. Army Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
Peter E PidcoeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Sheryl D FinucaneDepartment of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Seth A CheathamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
Lori A MichenerDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USBaylor University · USUniversity of Southern California · USU.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine · USVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · US

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000058 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2012 to 2015
$12.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000058NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThoracic SMT can improve symptoms in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. However, at this time the mechanisms of SMT are not well established. It is possible that changes in pain sensitivity may occur following SMT.

objectivesTo assess the immediate pain response in patients with shoulder pain following thoracic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) using pressure pain threshold (PPT), and to assess the relationship of change in pain sensitivity to patient-rated outcomes of pain and function following treatment.

designRandomized Controlled Study.

methodsSubjects with unilateral subacromial impingement syndrome (n = 45) were randomly assigned to receive treatment with thoracic SMT or sham thoracic SMT. PPT was measured at the painful shoulder (deltoid) and unaffected regions (contralateral deltoid and bilateral lower trapezius areas) immediately pre- and post-treatment. Patient-rated outcomes were pain (numeric pain rating scale - NPRS), function (Pennsylvania Shoulder Score - Penn), and global rating of change (GROC).

resultsThere were no significant differences between groups in pre-to post-treatment changes in PPT (p ≥ 0.583) nor were there significant changes in PPT within either group (p ≥ 0.372) following treatment. NPRS, Penn and GROC improved across both groups (p < 0.001), but there were no differences between the groups (p ≥ 0.574).

conclusionThere were no differences in pressure pain sensitivity between participants receiving thoracic SMT versus sham thoracic SMT. Both groups had improved patient-rated pain and function within 24-48 h of treatment, but there was no difference in outcomes between the groups.

Indexed as

Thoracic VertebraeFemaleHumansMaleManipulation, SpinalPain MeasurementRange of Motion, ArticularShoulder Impingement SyndromeTreatment OutcomePressure pain thresholdSubacromial impingementThoracic manipulation

Identifiers

PMID25595413
PMCPMC13257939
OpenAlexW2001222392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.