Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25595344›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

Imaging biomarkers in prostate cancer: role of PET/CT and MRI.

M Picchio, P Mapelli, V Panebianco, P Castellucci, E Incerti, A Briganti, G Gandaglia, M Kirienko, F Barchetti, C Nanni and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Targeted Molecular Imaging as a Biomarker in Urologic Oncology.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical significance of prostateWorld journal of radiology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

M PicchioNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy, picchio.maria@hsr.it.
P Mapelli
V Panebianco
P Castellucci
E Incerti
A Briganti
G Gandaglia
M Kirienko
F Barchetti
C Nanni
F Montorsi
L Gianolli
S Fanti
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is currently the most widely used biomarker of prostate cancer (PCa). PSA suggests the presence of primary tumour and disease relapse after treatment, but it is not able to provide a clear distinction between locoregional and distant disease. Molecular and functional imaging, that are able to provide a detailed and comprehensive overview of PCa extension, are more reliable tools for primary tumour detection and disease extension assessment both in staging and restaging. In the present review we evaluate the role of PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis, staging and restaging of PCa, and the use of these imaging modalities in prognosis, treatment planning and response assessment. Innovative imaging strategies including new radiotracers and hybrid scanners such as PET/MRI are also discussed.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdenocarcinomaAnimalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID25595344
OpenAlexW2030253103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.