ArticleBasic research in cardiology2015
Mitochondrially targeted Endonuclease III has a powerful anti-infarct effect in an in vivo rat model of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion.
Article in Basic research in cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating Mitochondrial DNA Aggravates Post-Ischemic Functional and Metabolic Recovery in an Isolated Rat Heart Model of Donation After Circulatory Death.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Rethinking Mitochondria: The Extracellular Dimension.Circulation research · 2026Review
- Dysregulated Redox Signaling and Its Impact on Inflammatory Pathways, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Autophagy and Cardiovascular Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nanoparticles For Rescue: Innovative Therapeutic Strategy For Cardiac Repair After Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Review
- Mitochondrial DNA Dysfunction in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Novel Therapeutic Target.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Disruption of mitochondrial DNA integrity in cardiomyocyte injury upon ischemia/reperfusion.Genes & diseases · 2025Review
- Key inflammatory players for infarcted mass and cardiac remodeling after acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Role of macrophage polarization in heart failure and traditional Chinese medicine treatment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Article
- Non-Coding RNAs: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment in Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- HMGB1-Mediated Activation of the Inflammatory-Reparative Response Following Myocardial Infarction.Cells · 2022Review
- Mitochondrial DNA Is a Vital Driving Force in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Cardiovascular Diseases.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Review
- Review
- Regulation of STAT3 and its role in cardioprotection by conditioning: focus on non-genomic roles targeting mitochondrial function.Basic research in cardiology · 2021Review
- An automated, high-throughput methodology optimized for quantitative cell-free mitochondrial and nuclear DNA isolation from plasma.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
- The Role of Extracellular DNA and Histones in Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury of the Myocardium.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2020Review
- Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: Pathophysiology, Current Clinical Management, and Potential Preventive Approaches.Mediators of inflammation · 2020Review
- Enhancing Base Excision Repair of Mitochondrial DNA to Reduce Ischemic Injury Following Reperfusion.Translational stroke research · 2019Article
- Programmed necrosis in cardiomyocytes: mitochondria, death receptors and beyond.British journal of pharmacology · 2019Review
- Ablation of Toll-like receptor 9 attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent reports indicate that elevating DNA glycosylase/AP lyase repair enzyme activity offers marked cytoprotection in cultured cells and a variety of injury models. In this study, we measured the effect of EndoIII, a fusion protein construct that traffics Endonuclease III, a DNA glycosylase/AP lyase, to the mitochondria, on infarct size in a rat model of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. Open-chest, anesthetized rats were subjected to 30 min of occlusion of a coronary artery followed by 2 h of reperfusion. An intravenous bolus of EndoIII, 8 mg/kg, just prior to reperfusion reduced infarct size from 43.8 ± 1.4% of the risk zone in control animals to 24.0 ± 1.3% with no detectable hemodynamic effect. Neither EndoIII's vehicle nor an enzymatically inactive EndoIII mutant (K120Q) offered any protection. The magnitude of EndoIII's protection was comparable to that seen with the platelet aggregation inhibitor cangrelor (25.0 ± 1.8% infarction of risk zone). Because loading with a P2Y12 receptor blocker to inhibit platelets is currently the standard of care for treatment of acute myocardial infarction, we tested whether EndoIII could further reduce infarct size in rats treated with a maximally protective dose of cangrelor. The combination reduced infarct size to 15.1 ± 0.9% which was significantly smaller than that seen with either cangrelor or EndoIII alone. Protection from cangrelor but not EndoIII was abrogated by pharmacologic blockade of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase or adenosine receptors indicating differing cellular mechanisms. We hypothesized that EndoIII protected the heart from spreading necrosis by preventing the release of proinflammatory fragments of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) into the heart tissue. In support of this hypothesis, an intravenous bolus at reperfusion of deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I) which should degrade any DNA fragments escaping into the extracellular space was as protective as EndoIII. Furthermore, the combination of EndoIII and DNase I produced additive protection. While EndoIII would maintain mitochondrial integrity in many of the ischemic cardiomyocytes, DNase I would further prevent mtDNA released from those cells that EndoIII could not save from propagating further necrosis. Thus, our mtDNA hypothesis would predict additive protection. Finally to demonstrate the toxicity of mtDNA, isolated hearts were subjected to 15 min of global ischemia. Infarct size doubled when the coronary vasculature was filled with mtDNA fragments during the period of global ischemia. To our knowledge, EndoIII and DNase are the first agents that can both be given at reperfusion and add to the protection of a P2Y12 blocker, and thus should be effective in today's patient with acute myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.