Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25595146›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2015

Speech dynamics are coded in the left motor cortex in fluent speakers but not in adults who stutter.

Nicole E Neef, T N Linh Hoang, Andreas Neef, Walter Paulus, Martin Sommer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07389694 (Modulating Bilateral Cortical Activation In Adults Who Stutter), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07389694 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Modulating Bilateral Cortical Activation In Adults Who Stutter: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKansas State UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled10ConditionsStuttering, AdultArmsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Evaluation of central auditory processing skills in children with stuttering.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reactive Inhibitory Control Precedes Overt Stuttering Events.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Biomarkers Obtained by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Stuttering: A Disorder of Energy Supply to Neurons?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Weak Vestibular Response in Persistent Developmental Stuttering.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Functional and Neuroanatomical Bases of Developmental Stuttering: Current Insights.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Planum temporale asymmetry in people who stutter.Journal of fluency disorders · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole E Neef1 Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany 2 Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Department of Neuropsychology, Leipzig, Germany nneef@gwdg.de.
T N Linh Hoang1 Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas Neef3 Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Department of Nonlinear Dynamics, Göttingen, Germany.
Walter Paulus1 Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Martin Sommer1 Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DEMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization · DEMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precise excitability regulation of neuronal circuits in the primary motor cortex is central to the successful and fluent production of speech. Our question was whether the involuntary execution of undesirable movements, e.g. stuttering, is linked to an insufficient excitability tuning of neural populations in the orofacial region of the primary motor cortex. We determined the speech-related time course of excitability modulation in the left and right primary motor tongue representation. Thirteen fluent speakers (four females, nine males; aged 23-44) and 13 adults who stutter (four females, nine males, aged 21-55) were asked to build verbs with the verbal prefix 'auf'. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied over the primary motor cortex during the transition phase between a fixed labiodental articulatory configuration and immediately following articulatory configurations, at different latencies after transition onset. Bilateral electromyography was recorded from self-adhesive electrodes placed on the surface of the tongue. Off-line, we extracted the motor evoked potential amplitudes and normalized these amplitudes to the individual baseline excitability during the fixed configuration. Fluent speakers demonstrated a prominent left hemisphere increase of motor cortex excitability in the transition phase (P = 0.009). In contrast, the excitability of the right primary motor tongue representation was unchanged. Interestingly, adults afflicted with stuttering revealed a lack of left-hemisphere facilitation. Moreover, the magnitude of facilitation was negatively correlated with stuttering frequency. Although orofacial midline muscles are bilaterally innervated from corticobulbar projections of both hemispheres, our results indicate that speech motor plans are controlled primarily in the left primary speech motor cortex. This speech motor planning-related asymmetry towards the left orofacial motor cortex is missing in stuttering. Moreover, a negative correlation between the amount of facilitation and stuttering severity suggests that we discovered a main physiological principle of fluent speech production and its role in stuttering.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAnalysis of VarianceElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexPhotic StimulationReaction TimeSpeechStutteringTonguemotor controlmotor evoked potentials, stutteringprimary motor cortextranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID25595146
PMCPMC4408433
OpenAlexW2155822374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.