Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25594918›Full record

ReviewProteomics. Clinical applications2015

Clinical proteomics: promises, challenges and limitations of affinity arrays.

Christian Betzen, Mohamed Saiel Saeed Alhamdani, Smiths Lueong, Christoph Schröder, Axel Stang, Jörg D Hoheisel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proteomics. Clinical applications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Gut Microbiome Proteomics in Food Allergies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Precision medicine integrating whole-genome sequencing, comprehensive metabolomics, and advanced imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. The nuts and bolts of omics for the clinical allergist.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian BetzenDivision of Functional Genome Analysis, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Pediatric Medicine I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mohamed Saiel Saeed Alhamdani
Smiths Lueong
Christoph Schröder
Axel Stang
Jörg D Hoheisel
Heidelberg University · DEAsklepios Klinik Barmbek · DEDKFZ-ZMBH Alliance · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the establishment of DNA/RNA sequencing as a means of clinical diagnosis, the analysis of the proteome is next in line. As a matter of fact, proteome-based diagnostics is bound to be even more informative, since proteins are directly involved in the actual cellular processes that are responsible for disease. However, the structural variation and the biochemical differences between proteins, the much wider range in concentration and their spatial distribution as well as the fact that protein activity frequently relies on interaction increase the methodological complexity enormously, particularly if an accuracy and robustness is required that is sufficient for clinical utility. Here, we discuss the contribution that protein microarray formats could play towards proteome-based diagnostics.

Indexed as

HumansProtein Array AnalysisProteomicsAffinity profilingAntibodiesImmunoassayInteractionProtein microarrays

Identifiers

PMID25594918
PMCPMC5024047
OpenAlexW1989404228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.