Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25593746›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2014

When to stop septic shock resuscitation: clues from a dynamic perfusion monitoring.

Glenn Hernandez, Cecilia Luengo, Alejandro Bruhn, Eduardo Kattan, Gilberto Friedman, Gustavo A Ospina-Tascon, Andrea Fuentealba, Ricardo Castro, Tomas Regueira, Carlos Romero and 2 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03078712 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Early Goal Directed Therapy Using a Physiological Holistic View. A Multicenter Study in Latin America: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2017 to 2018Enrolled424ConditionsSeptic Shock, Hyperlactatemia, Peripheral PerfusionArmsPeripheral Perfusion guided resuscitation, Lactate guided resuscitation
NCT03762005 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Peripheral Perfusion Versus Lactate Targeted Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock: ANDROMEDA-SHOCK PHYSIOLOGY STUDY

TypeinterventionalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2018 to 2019Enrolled46ConditionsSeptic Shock, Hyperlactatemia, Peripheral PerfusionArmsCRT guided resuscitation, Lactate guided resuscitation
NCT04693923 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Capillary Refill Time Response to a Rapid Fluid Challenge in Septic Shock Patients: Pathophysiological Determinants, and Relation to Changes in Systemic, Regional and Microcirculatory Blood Flow

TypeinterventionalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2021 to 2023Enrolled42ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsFluid challenge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Lactate clearance in patients with septic shock: identifying the point of diminishing returns.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Article
  12. Fluid management methods for severely burned patients: a narrative review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Current standard of care for septic shock.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Use of COAnnals of intensive care · 2025
    Review
  18. Passive leg raising test versus rapid fluid challenge in critically ill medical patients.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Glenn HernandezDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Cecilia LuengoUnidad de Pacientes Críticos, Hospital Clínico, Universidad de Chile, Santos Dumont 999, Santiago 8380456, Chile.
Alejandro BruhnDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Eduardo KattanDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Gilberto FriedmanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre-RS, 90035-903, Brazil.
Gustavo A Ospina-TasconIntensive Care Unit, Fundación Valle del Lili, Av. Simón Bolívar Cra 98 # 18-49, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia.
Andrea FuentealbaDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Ricardo CastroDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Tomas RegueiraDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Carlos RomeroUnidad de Pacientes Críticos, Hospital Clínico, Universidad de Chile, Santos Dumont 999, Santiago 8380456, Chile.
Can InceDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 50-60, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jan BakkerDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 50-60, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe decision of when to stop septic shock resuscitation is a critical but yet a relatively unexplored aspect of care. This is especially relevant since the risks of over-resuscitation with fluid overload or inotropes have been highlighted in recent years. A recent guideline has proposed normalization of central venous oxygen saturation and/or lactate as therapeutic end-points, assuming that these variables are equivalent or interchangeable. However, since the physiological determinants of both are totally different, it is legitimate to challenge the rationale of this proposal. We designed this study to gain more insights into the most appropriate resuscitation goal from a dynamic point of view. Our objective was to compare the normalization rates of these and other potential perfusion-related targets in a cohort of septic shock survivors.

methodsWe designed a prospective, observational clinical study. One hundred and four septic shock patients with hyperlactatemia were included and followed until hospital discharge. The 84 hospital-survivors were kept for final analysis. A multimodal perfusion assessment was performed at baseline, 2, 6, and 24 h of ICU treatment.

resultsSome variables such as central venous oxygen saturation, central venous-arterial pCO2 gradient, and capillary refill time were already normal in more than 70% of survivors at 6 h. Lactate presented a much slower normalization rate decreasing significantly at 6 h compared to that of baseline (4.0 [3.0 to 4.9] vs. 2.7 [2.2 to 3.9] mmol/L; p < 0.01) but with only 52% of patients achieving normality at 24 h. Sublingual microcirculatory variables exhibited the slowest recovery rate with persistent derangements still present in almost 80% of patients at 24 h.

conclusionsPerfusion-related variables exhibit very different normalization rates in septic shock survivors, most of them exhibiting a biphasic response with an initial rapid improvement, followed by a much slower trend thereafter. This fact should be taken into account to determine the most appropriate criteria to stop resuscitation opportunely and avoid the risk of over-resuscitation.

Indexed as

LactateMicrocirculationPerfusionResuscitationSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID25593746
PMCPMC4273696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.