Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25593706›Full record

ArticleJournal of vaccines & immunization2014

Developing a vaccine for human rhinoviruses.

Gary R McLean

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vaccines & immunization, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Toll-like receptor-agonist-based therapies for respiratory viral diseases: thinking outside the cell.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Early approval of COVID-19 vaccines: Pros and cons.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Human rhinovirus-specific CD8 T cell responses target conserved and unusual epitopes.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. [Rhinoviruses].Der Internist · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Emerging Respiratory Viruses in Children.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gary R McLeanCellular and Molecular Immunology Research Centre, London Metropolitan University, London, N7 8DB, UK.
London Metropolitan University · GB

Funding

The Dunhill Medical Trust SA29/0513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhinoviruses (RV's) are common human pathogens of the respiratory tract being the most frequent cause of mild diseases of the upper respiratory tract (common cold) but more importantly they are a major initiator of acute exacerbations of chronic airway diseases. Infections can be life threatening in the latter context however RV -induced common colds have an associated economic cost from loss of productivity due to absence from work or school. There are no appropriate antiviral therapies available and vaccine strategies have failed because of the large number of viral serotypes and the lack of cross-serotype protection generated. Here, approaches past and present for development of a vaccine to these widespread human pathogens are highlighted.

Indexed as

chronic airway diseaseshuman pathogensimmunitymouse modelrhinovirusvaccine

Identifiers

PMID25593706
PMCPMC4291752
OpenAlexW2079724993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.