Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25593596›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2014

The emerging need for family-centric initiatives for obtaining consent in personal genome research.

Jusaku Minari, Harriet Teare, Colin Mitchell, Jane Kaye, Kazuto Kato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Reflections on dynamic consent in biomedical research: the story so far.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jusaku MinariDepartment of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871 Japan.
Harriet TeareCentre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies (HeLEX), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF UK.
Colin MitchellCentre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies (HeLEX), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF UK.
Jane KayeCentre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies (HeLEX), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF UK.
Kazuto KatoDepartment of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871 Japan ; Institute for Integrated Cell-Material Sciences (iCeMS), Kyoto University Yoshida Ushinomiya-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501 Japan.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 096599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of information and communication technology can offer a novel way to promote family-centric initiatives for informed consent, and can address associated ethical challenges in personal genome research.

Identifiers

PMID25593596
PMCPMC4295276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.