Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25593595›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2014

Virus-host interactomics: new insights and opportunities for antiviral drug discovery.

Benoît de Chassey, Laurène Meyniel-Schicklin, Jacky Vonderscher, Patrice André, Vincent Lotteau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Drug repositioningFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Compound FC-10696 Inhibits Egress of Marburg Virus.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benoît de ChasseyENYO Pharma SAS, Lyon, 69007 France.
Laurène Meyniel-SchicklinENYO Pharma SAS, Lyon, 69007 France.
Jacky VonderscherENYO Pharma SAS, Lyon, 69007 France.
Patrice AndréHospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France ; CIRI, Université de Lyon, Lyon, 69365 France ; Inserm, U1111, Lyon, 69365 France.
Vincent LotteauCIRI, Université de Lyon, Lyon, 69365 France ; Inserm, U1111, Lyon, 69365 France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current therapeutic arsenal against viral infections remains limited, with often poor efficacy and incomplete coverage, and appears inadequate to face the emergence of drug resistance. Our understanding of viral biology and pathophysiology and our ability to develop a more effective antiviral arsenal would greatly benefit from a more comprehensive picture of the events that lead to viral replication and associated symptoms. Towards this goal, the construction of virus-host interactomes is instrumental, mainly relying on the assumption that a viral infection at the cellular level can be viewed as a number of perturbations introduced into the host protein network when viral proteins make new connections and disrupt existing ones. Here, we review advances in interactomic approaches for viral infections, focusing on high-throughput screening (HTS) technologies and on the generation of high-quality datasets. We show how these are already beginning to offer intriguing perspectives in terms of virus-host cell biology and the control of cellular functions, and we conclude by offering a summary of the current situation regarding the potential development of host-oriented antiviral therapeutics.

Identifiers

PMID25593595
PMCPMC4295275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.