ArticleMolecular vision2015
Methodologies for analysis of patterning in the mouse RPE sheet.
Article in Molecular vision, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stress Inference in Retinal Pigment Epithelium in C57BL/6J Mouse.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Modulation of Systemic Osmolarity Alters Retinal Thickness and Schisis Cavities Without Blood Retinal Barrier Disruption in Rs1 Knockout Mice.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Prominin-1 Regulates Retinal Pigment Epithelium Homeostasis: Transcriptomic Insights into Degenerative Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- High-Resolution Imaging and Interpretation of Three-Dimensional RPE Sheet Structure.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Loss of Pigment Epithelium Derived Factor Sensitizes C57BL/6J Mice to Light-Induced Retinal Damage.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Preformed Vesicle Approach to LNP Manufacturing Enhances Retinal mRNA Delivery.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Article
- Aberrant lipid accumulation and retinal pigment epithelium dysfunction in PRCD-deficient mice.Experimental eye research · 2024Article
- Age-Related RPE changes in Wildtype C57BL/6J Mice between 2 and 32 Months.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium Causes Diminished Function and Subtle Morphological Changes in Retina and RPE of Mice.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- A New Preclinical Model of Retinitis Pigmentosa Due toOphthalmology science · 2023Article
- Lipid nanoparticles with PEG-variant surface modifications mediate genome editing in the mouse retina.Nature communications · 2023Article
- TNFα induced by DNA-sensing in macrophage compromises retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) barrier function.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Self-supervised semantic segmentation of retinal pigment epithelium cells in flatmount fluorescent microscopy images.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Whole-mouse clearing and imaging at the cellular level with vDISCO.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- CDCP1 regulates retinal pigmented epithelial barrier integrity for the development of experimental autoimmune uveitis.JCI insight · 2022Article
- The Circadian Clock in the Retinal Pigment Epithelium Controls the Diurnal Rhythm of Phagocytic Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Electrophysiologic and Morphologic Strain Differences in a Low-Dose NaIO3-Induced Retinal Pigment Epithelium Damage Model.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Fully automated detection, segmentation, and analysis of in vivo RPE single cells.Eye (London, England) · 2021Article
- Computational Model-Based Estimation of Mouse Eyeball Structure From Two-Dimensional Flatmount Microscopy Images.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Photoreceptor Degeneration in Homozygous Male Per2Journal of biological rhythms · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOur goal was to optimize procedures for assessing shapes, sizes, and other quantitative metrics of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells and contact- and noncontact-mediated cell-to-cell interactions across a large series of flatmount RPE images.
methodsThe two principal methodological advances of this study were optimization of a mouse RPE flatmount preparation and refinement of open-access software to rapidly analyze large numbers of flatmount images. Mouse eyes were harvested, and extra-orbital fat and muscles were removed. Eyes were fixed for 10 min, and dissected by puncturing the cornea with a sharp needle or a stab knife. Four radial cuts were made with iridectomy scissors from the puncture to near the optic nerve head. The lens, iris, and the neural retina were removed, leaving the RPE sheet exposed. The dissection and outcomes were monitored and evaluated by video recording. The RPE sheet was imaged under fluorescence confocal microscopy after staining for ZO-1 to identify RPE cell boundaries. Photoshop, Java, Perl, and Matlab scripts, as well as CellProfiler, were used to quantify selected parameters. Data were exported into Excel spreadsheets for further analysis.
resultsA simplified dissection procedure afforded a consistent source of images that could be processed by computer. The dissection and flatmounting techniques were illustrated in a video recording. Almost all of the sheet could be routinely imaged, and substantial fractions of the RPE sheet (usually 20-50% of the sheet) could be analyzed. Several common technical problems were noted and workarounds developed. The software-based analysis merged 25 to 36 images into one and adjusted settings to record an image suitable for large-scale identification of cell-to-cell boundaries, and then obtained quantitative descriptors of the shape of each cell, its neighbors, and interactions beyond direct cell-cell contact in the sheet. To validate the software, human- and computer-analyzed results were compared. Whether tallied manually or automatically with software, the resulting cell measurements were in close agreement. We compared normal with diseased RPE cells during aging with quantitative cell size and shape metrics. Subtle differences between the RPE sheet characteristics of young and old mice were identified. The IRBP(-/-) mouse RPE sheet did not differ from C57BL/6J (wild type, WT), suggesting that IRBP does not play a direct role in maintaining the health of the RPE cell, while the slow loss of photoreceptor (PhR) cells previously established in this knockout does support a role in the maintenance of PhR cells. Rd8 mice exhibited several measurable changes in patterns of RPE cells compared to WT, suggesting a slow degeneration of the RPE sheet that had not been previously noticed in rd8.
conclusionsAn optimized dissection method and a series of programs were used to establish a rapid and hands-off analysis. The software-aided, high-sampling-size approach performed as well as trained human scorers, but was considerably faster and easier. This method allows tens to hundreds of thousands of cells to be analyzed, each with 23 metrics. With this combination of dissection and image analysis of the RPE sheet, we can now analyze cell-to-cell interactions of immediate neighbors. In the future, we may be able to observe interactions of second, third, or higher ring neighbors and analyze tension in sheets, which might be expected to deviate from normal near large bumps in the RPE sheet caused by druse or when large frank holes in the RPE sheet are observed in geographic atrophy. This method and software can be readily applied to other aspects of vision science, neuroscience, and epithelial biology where patterns may exist in a sheet or surface of cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25593512PMC4301600W147227619What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.