Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25593512›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2015

Methodologies for analysis of patterning in the mouse RPE sheet.

Jeffrey H Boatright, Nupur Dalal, Micah A Chrenek, Christopher Gardner, Alison Ziesel, Yi Jiang, Hans E Grossniklaus, John M Nickerson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stress Inference in Retinal Pigment Epithelium in C57BL/6J Mouse.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Photoreceptor Degeneration in Homozygous Male Per2Journal of biological rhythms · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey H BoatrightDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Nupur DalalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Micah A ChrenekDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Christopher GardnerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Alison ZieselDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Yi JiangDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
Hans E GrossniklausDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
John M NickersonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Emory University · USGeorgia State University · US

Funding

P30-Core Grant for Vision Research Core CP30EY006360 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BOATRIGHT, JEFFREY H · 1986 to 2025
$15.3M
Oligonucleotide Repair of a Retinal Degeneration ModelR01EY014026 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BOATRIGHT, JEFFREY H · 2004 to 2015
$4.1M
Ocular Growth, Emmetropia, and Interphotoreceptor Retinoid-Binding Protein (IRBP)R01EY021592 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BOATRIGHT, JEFFREY H, IUVONE, P MICHAEL · 2013 to 2021
$3.3M
Gene Delivery in Retinal DiseasesR01EY016470 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NICKERSON, JOHN M · 2006 to 2015
$3.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY006360NEI NIH HHS P30EY006360NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014026NEI NIH HHS R01EY014026NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016470NEI NIH HHS R01EY016470NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021592NEI NIH HHS R01EY021592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur goal was to optimize procedures for assessing shapes, sizes, and other quantitative metrics of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells and contact- and noncontact-mediated cell-to-cell interactions across a large series of flatmount RPE images.

methodsThe two principal methodological advances of this study were optimization of a mouse RPE flatmount preparation and refinement of open-access software to rapidly analyze large numbers of flatmount images. Mouse eyes were harvested, and extra-orbital fat and muscles were removed. Eyes were fixed for 10 min, and dissected by puncturing the cornea with a sharp needle or a stab knife. Four radial cuts were made with iridectomy scissors from the puncture to near the optic nerve head. The lens, iris, and the neural retina were removed, leaving the RPE sheet exposed. The dissection and outcomes were monitored and evaluated by video recording. The RPE sheet was imaged under fluorescence confocal microscopy after staining for ZO-1 to identify RPE cell boundaries. Photoshop, Java, Perl, and Matlab scripts, as well as CellProfiler, were used to quantify selected parameters. Data were exported into Excel spreadsheets for further analysis.

resultsA simplified dissection procedure afforded a consistent source of images that could be processed by computer. The dissection and flatmounting techniques were illustrated in a video recording. Almost all of the sheet could be routinely imaged, and substantial fractions of the RPE sheet (usually 20-50% of the sheet) could be analyzed. Several common technical problems were noted and workarounds developed. The software-based analysis merged 25 to 36 images into one and adjusted settings to record an image suitable for large-scale identification of cell-to-cell boundaries, and then obtained quantitative descriptors of the shape of each cell, its neighbors, and interactions beyond direct cell-cell contact in the sheet. To validate the software, human- and computer-analyzed results were compared. Whether tallied manually or automatically with software, the resulting cell measurements were in close agreement. We compared normal with diseased RPE cells during aging with quantitative cell size and shape metrics. Subtle differences between the RPE sheet characteristics of young and old mice were identified. The IRBP(-/-) mouse RPE sheet did not differ from C57BL/6J (wild type, WT), suggesting that IRBP does not play a direct role in maintaining the health of the RPE cell, while the slow loss of photoreceptor (PhR) cells previously established in this knockout does support a role in the maintenance of PhR cells. Rd8 mice exhibited several measurable changes in patterns of RPE cells compared to WT, suggesting a slow degeneration of the RPE sheet that had not been previously noticed in rd8.

conclusionsAn optimized dissection method and a series of programs were used to establish a rapid and hands-off analysis. The software-aided, high-sampling-size approach performed as well as trained human scorers, but was considerably faster and easier. This method allows tens to hundreds of thousands of cells to be analyzed, each with 23 metrics. With this combination of dissection and image analysis of the RPE sheet, we can now analyze cell-to-cell interactions of immediate neighbors. In the future, we may be able to observe interactions of second, third, or higher ring neighbors and analyze tension in sheets, which might be expected to deviate from normal near large bumps in the RPE sheet caused by druse or when large frank holes in the RPE sheet are observed in geographic atrophy. This method and software can be readily applied to other aspects of vision science, neuroscience, and epithelial biology where patterns may exist in a sheet or surface of cells.

Indexed as

AgingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareAnimalsBiomarkersCell CommunicationCell ShapeCell SizeEye ProteinsGene ExpressionMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMicroscopy, FluorescencePhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateRetinal Pigment EpitheliumBiomarkersEye ProteinsRetinol-Binding ProteinsRetinol-Binding Proteins, InterstitialTjp1 protein, mouseZonula Occludens-1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID25593512
PMCPMC4301600
OpenAlexW147227619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.