Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25593259›Full record

ArticleGenome announcements2015

Draft Genome Sequence of the Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356.

Maria Mercedes Palomino, Mariana C Allievi, Joaquina Fina Martin, Pablo M Waehner, Mariano Prado Acosta, Carmen Sanchez Rivas, Sandra M Ruzal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome announcements, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. In silico prospection of Lactobacillus acidophilus strains with potential probiotic activity.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Complete Genome Sequence ofGenome announcements · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Mercedes PalominoUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, IQUIBICEN-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariana C AllieviUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, IQUIBICEN-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Joaquina Fina MartinUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, IQUIBICEN-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pablo M WaehnerUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, IQUIBICEN-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariano Prado AcostaUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, IQUIBICEN-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carmen Sanchez RivasUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, IQUIBICEN-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sandra M RuzalUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, IQUIBICEN-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina sandra@qb.fcen.uba.ar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the 1,956,699-bp draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus acidophilus strain ATCC 4356. Comparative genomic analysis revealed 99.96% similarity with L. acidophilus NCFM NC_006814.3 and 99.97% with La-14 NC_021181.2 genomes.

Identifiers

PMID25593259
PMCPMC4299901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.