ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2015
Skewed expression of the genes encoding epigenetic modifiers in high-risk uveal melanoma.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor subtypes and signature model construction based on chromatin regulators for better prediction of prognosis in uveal melanoma.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2023Article
- NSUN2-mediated RNA mEpigenetics · 2022Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic significance of HDAC11 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.Translational lung cancer research · 2022Article
- Loss of polycomb repressive complex 1 activity and chromosomal instability drive uveal melanoma progression.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Expression of HDACs 1, 3 and 8 Is Upregulated in the Presence of Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Uveal Melanoma.Cancers · 2021Article
- Proteomics of Primary Uveal Melanoma: Insights into Metastasis and Protein Biomarkers.Cancers · 2021Article
- ALKBH5-mediated mAging · 2021Article
- Article
- Novel Approaches to the Systemic Management of Uveal Melanoma.Current oncology reports · 2020Review
- Targeting Epigenetic Modifications in Uveal Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Secondary Somatic Mutations in G-Protein-Related Pathways and Mutation Signatures in Uveal Melanoma.Cancers · 2019Article
- Review
- Review
- Tumour Expression of Histone Deacetylases in Uveal Melanoma.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2019Article
- KDM4B: A Nail for Every Hammer?Genes · 2019Review
- Treatment of uveal melanoma: where are we now?Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2018Review
- Association of tumor and plasma microRNA expression with tumor monosomy-3 in patients with uveal melanoma.Clinical epigenetics · 2016Article
- Clinico-Pathological Association of Delineated miRNAs in Uveal Melanoma with Monosomy 3/Disomy 3 Chromosomal Aberrations.PloS one · 2016Article
- iTRAQ Quantitative Proteomic Comparison of Metastatic and Non-Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Tumors.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMonosomy 3 (M3) or the presence of a specific RNA expression profile, known as class 2, is strongly associated with death from uveal melanoma (UM). Given the important role of epigenetic processes in cancer development and progression, we compared the transcriptional profiles of a selection of epigenetic regulators between primary UM with a good and a bad prognosis.
methodsTranscriptional levels of 59 epigenetic regulator genes were measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) in 20 UM, 12 with monosomy of chromosome 3 (M3) and 8 with disomy of chromosome 3 (D3). Validation was performed in an independent cohort. Expression levels were compared to clinicopathological characteristics, including class type. Bisulfite sequencing was used to evaluate the role of DNA methylation in gene silencing.
resultsIn the first set of tumors, general downregulation of transcription of the genes encoding epigenetic regulatory enzymes was seen in association with M3. The 10 genes with the highest differential expression between M3 and D3 were selected and were analyzed in a second set of tumors. In the validation set, significantly lower levels of KAT2B (P = 0.008), HDAC11 (P = 0.009), KMT1C (P = 0.05), KDM4B (P = 0.003), KDM6B (P = 0.04), and BMI-1 (P = 0.001) transcripts were found in tumors with M3/class 2. Methylation of C-phosphate-G (CpG) residues was not observed on the putative regulatory regions of KAT2B, KDM4B, or KDM6B.
conclusionsExpression levels of a number of histone-modifying genes and polycomb family members are significantly lower in uveal melanoma with monosomy 3/class 2, supporting a general dysregulation of epigenetic modifiers in UM with a bad prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.