Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25593016›Full record

Trial reportOral oncology2015

A randomized, phase 2 trial of docetaxel with or without PX-866, an irreversible oral phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Antonio Jimeno, Julie E Bauman, Charles Weissman, Douglas Adkins, Ian Schnadig, Patrice Beauregard, Daniel W Bowles, Alexander Spira, Benjamin Levy, Nagashree Seetharamu and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oral oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. JCO precision oncology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio JimenoUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States. Electronic address: antonio.jimeno@ucdenver.edu.
Julie E BaumanUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Charles WeissmanNew York Hematology, New York, NY, United States.
Douglas AdkinsWashington University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Ian SchnadigCompass Oncology, Tualatin, OR, United States; US Oncology Research, The Woodlands, TX, United States.
Patrice BeauregardCHUS Hôpital Fleurimont, Quebec, Canada.
Daniel W BowlesUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States; Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, United States.
Alexander SpiraVirginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA, United States; US Oncology Research, The Woodlands, TX, United States.
Benjamin LevyBeth Israel Hospital, St. Luke's Hospital, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, United States.
Nagashree SeetharamuNew York University, New York, NY, United States.
Diana HausmanOncothyreon Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
Luke WalkerOncothyreon Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
Charles M RudinJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Keisuke ShiraiMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Oncotherapeutics (United States) · USThe US Oncology Network · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USHôpital Fleurimont · CAJohns Hopkins University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USNew York Oncology Hematology · USNew York University · USSt. Luke's Hospital · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Immune activation by cetuximab in head and neck cancer patientsR01DE019727 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FERRIS, ROBERT L. · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
Chemokine Signals in Head and Neck Cancer ProgressionR01CA115902 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FERRIS, ROBERT L. · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115902NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019727Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe phosphotidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/serine-threonine kinase (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is frequently altered in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). PX-866 is an oral, irreversible, pan-isoform inhibitor of PI3K. Preclinical models revealed synergy with docetaxel and a phase 1 trial demonstrated tolerability of this combination. This randomized phase 2 study evaluated PX-866 combined with docetaxel in patients with advanced, refractory HNSCC.

methodsPatients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic HNSCC who had received at least one and no more than two prior systemic treatment regimens were randomized (1:1) to a combination of docetaxel (75mg/m(2) IV every 21days) with or without PX-866 (8mg PO daily; Arms A and B, respectively). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and correlation of biomarker analyses with efficacy outcomes.

results85 patients were enrolled. There was a non-significant improvement in response rate in the combination arm (14% vs. 5%; P=0.13). Median PFS was 92days in Arm A and 82days in Arm B (P=0.42). There was no difference in OS between the two arms (263 vs. 195days; P=0.62). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were infrequent, but more common in the combination arm with respect to diarrhea (17% vs. 2%), nausea (7% vs. 0%), and febrile neutropenia (21% vs. 5%); grade 3 or higher anemia was more frequent in arm B (7% vs. 27%). PIK3CA mutations or PTEN loss were infrequently observed.

conclusionThe addition of PX-866 to docetaxel did not improve PFS, RR, or OS in patients with advanced, refractory HNSCC without molecular pre-selection.

Indexed as

Neoplasm MetastasisPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellDocetaxelFemaleGonanesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTaxoidsDocetaxelGonanesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsPX-866TaxoidsDocetaxelHead and neck squamous cell cancerPI3KPIK3CA

Identifiers

PMID25593016
PMCPMC4857706
OpenAlexW2163898107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.