ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
Fast individual ancestry inference from DNA sequence data leveraging allele frequencies for multiple populations.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- KANN: estimation of genetic ancestry profiles by nearest neighbor regression.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Genetic Insights Into Human-Driven Hybridization, Cultural Shifts, and Ecological Consequences of Feral Pigs (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- FRAME: fast reference-based ancestry makeup estimation tool.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Impact of Genetic Ancestry on Genomics and Survival Outcomes in T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Blood cancer discovery · 2025Article
- A high-throughput screening method for selecting feature SNPs to evaluate breed diversity and infer ancestry.Genome research · 2025Article
- Combining whole genome sequencing and non-adaptive group testing for large-scale ethnicity screens.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Facing the challenges to shorten the diagnostic odyssey: first Whole Genome Sequencing experience of a Colombian cohort with suspected rare diseases.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Increased AID results in mutations at the CRLF2 locus implicated in Latin American ALL health disparities.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A new genomic framework to categorize pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- Genetic dissection of resistance to gray leaf spot by genome-wide association study in a multi-parent maize population.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Ancestry-specific polygenic risk scores are risk enhancers for clinical cardiovascular disease assessments.Nature communications · 2023Article
- A potential candidate gene associated with the angles of the ear leaf and the second leaf above the ear leaf in maize.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Genomic Analysis of Chinese Indigenous Ningxiang Pigs: Genomic Breed Compositions, Runs of Homozygosity, and Beyond.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Rye: genetic ancestry inference at biobank scale.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- MD-ALL: an Integrative Platform for Molecular Diagnosis of B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Research square · 2023Article
- A look under the hood of genomic-estimated breed compositions for brangus cattle: What have we learned?Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- A whole genome sequencing study of moderate to severe asthma identifies a lung function locus associated with asthma risk.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Unraveling genetic admixture in the Indian crossbred cattle by different approaches using Bovine 50K BeadChip.Tropical animal health and production · 2022Article
- Class II Human Leukocyte Antigen Variants Associate With Risk of Pegaspargase Hypersensitivity.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021Article
- Summix: A method for detecting and adjusting for population structure in genetic summary data.American journal of human genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEstimation of individual ancestry from genetic data is useful for the analysis of disease association studies, understanding human population history and interpreting personal genomic variation. New, computationally efficient methods are needed for ancestry inference that can effectively utilize existing information about allele frequencies associated with different human populations and can work directly with DNA sequence reads.
resultsWe describe a fast method for estimating the relative contribution of known reference populations to an individual's genetic ancestry. Our method utilizes allele frequencies from the reference populations and individual genotype or sequence data to obtain a maximum likelihood estimate of the global admixture proportions using the BFGS optimization algorithm. It accounts for the uncertainty in genotypes present in sequence data by using genotype likelihoods and does not require individual genotype data from external reference panels. Simulation studies and application of the method to real datasets demonstrate that our method is significantly times faster than previous methods and has comparable accuracy. Using data from the 1000 Genomes project, we show that estimates of the genome-wide average ancestry for admixed individuals are consistent between exome sequence data and whole-genome low-coverage sequence data. Finally, we demonstrate that our method can be used to estimate admixture proportions using pooled sequence data making it a valuable tool for controlling for population stratification in sequencing based association studies that utilize DNA pooling.
conclusionsOur method is an efficient and versatile tool for estimating ancestry from DNA sequence data and is available from https://sites.google.com/site/vibansal/software/iAdmix .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.