ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
Biomedical question answering using semantic relations.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Question answering systems for health professionals at the point of care-a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Pooled it
- Optimizing biomedical information retrieval with a keyword frequency-driven prompt enhancement strategy.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Broad-coverage biomedical relation extraction with SemRep.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- A Light-Weight Text Summarization System for Fast Access to Medical Evidence.Frontiers in digital health · 2020Article
- Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Article
- Using FHIR to Construct a Corpus of Clinical Questions Annotated with Logical Forms and Answers.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019Article
- Biomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Qcorp: an annotated classification corpus of Chinese health questions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Semantic annotation of consumer health questions.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- MELODI: Mining Enriched Literature Objects to Derive Intermediates.International journal of epidemiology · 2018Article
- A Pilot Study of Biomedical Text Comprehension using an Attention-Based Deep Neural Reader: Design and Experimental Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2018Article
- Using Literature-Based Discovery to Explain Adverse Drug Effects.Journal of medical systems · 2016Article
- Automated identification of molecular effects of drugs (AIMED).Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Sortal anaphora resolution to enhance relation extraction from biomedical literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Resource Classification for Medical Questions.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016Article
- Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015Review
- Disease Related Knowledge Summarization Based on Deep Graph Search.BioMed research international · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe proliferation of the scientific literature in the field of biomedicine makes it difficult to keep abreast of current knowledge, even for domain experts. While general Web search engines and specialized information retrieval (IR) systems have made important strides in recent decades, the problem of accurate knowledge extraction from the biomedical literature is far from solved. Classical IR systems usually return a list of documents that have to be read by the user to extract relevant information. This tedious and time-consuming work can be lessened with automatic Question Answering (QA) systems, which aim to provide users with direct and precise answers to their questions. In this work we propose a novel methodology for QA based on semantic relations extracted from the biomedical literature.
resultsWe extracted semantic relations with the SemRep natural language processing system from 122,421,765 sentences, which came from 21,014,382 MEDLINE citations (i.e., the complete MEDLINE distribution up to the end of 2012). A total of 58,879,300 semantic relation instances were extracted and organized in a relational database. The QA process is implemented as a search in this database, which is accessed through a Web-based application, called SemBT (available at http://sembt.mf.uni-lj.si ). We conducted an extensive evaluation of the proposed methodology in order to estimate the accuracy of extracting a particular semantic relation from a particular sentence. Evaluation was performed by 80 domain experts. In total 7,510 semantic relation instances belonging to 2,675 distinct relations were evaluated 12,083 times. The instances were evaluated as correct 8,228 times (68%).
conclusionsIn this work we propose an innovative methodology for biomedical QA. The system is implemented as a Web-based application that is able to provide precise answers to a wide range of questions. A typical question is answered within a few seconds. The tool has some extensions that make it especially useful for interpretation of DNA microarray results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.