Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25592581›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2015

Variable selection method for the identification of epistatic models.

Emily Rose Holzinger, Silke Szymczak, Abhijit Dasgupta, James Malley, Qing Li, Joan E Bailey-Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily Rose HolzingerComputational and Statistical Genomics Branch (NHGRI, NIH), Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. emily.holzinger@nih.gov.
Silke Szymczak
Abhijit Dasgupta
James Malley
Qing Li
Joan E Bailey-Wilson

Funding

Development of statistical genetics methodologyZIAHG000153 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BAILEY-WILSON, JOAN ELLEN · 2009 to 2022
$5.0M
Statistical Learning for Biomedical DataZIACT000271 · CIT · CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY · PI MALLEY, JAMES D · 2009 to 2017
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 GM999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard analysis methods for genome wide association studies (GWAS) are not robust to complex disease models, such as interactions between variables with small main effects. These types of effects likely contribute to the heritability of complex human traits. Machine learning methods that are capable of identifying interactions, such as Random Forests (RF), are an alternative analysis approach. One caveat to RF is that there is no standardized method of selecting variables so that false positives are reduced while retaining adequate power. To this end, we have developed a novel variable selection method called relative recurrency variable importance metric (r2VIM). This method incorporates recurrency and variance estimation to assist in optimal threshold selection. For this study, we specifically address how this method performs in data with almost completely epistatic effects (i.e. no marginal effects). Our results show that with appropriate parameter settings, r2VIM can identify interaction effects when the marginal effects are virtually nonexistent. It also outperforms logistic regression, which has essentially no power under this type of model when the number of potential features (genetic variants) is large. (All Supplementary Data can be found here: http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/manuscripts/Bailey-Wilson/r2VIM_epi/).

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticModels, GeneticAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLinkage DisequilibriumLogistic ModelsMachine LearningPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID25592581
PMCPMC4299919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.