Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25592580›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2015

A screening-testing approach for detecting gene-environment interactions using sequential penalized and unpenalized multiple logistic regression.

H Robert Frost, Angeline S Andrew, Margaret R Karagas, Jason H Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H Robert FrostInstitute for Quantitative Biomedical Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
Angeline S Andrew
Margaret R Karagas
Jason H Moore

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Ultrastructural analysis of axonal Kv2-mediated endoplasmic reticulum/plasma membrane (ER/PM) junctionsP20GM103506 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Yina Hsing Huang · 2012 to 2026
$60.1M
NONMELANOMA SKIN CANCER IN NEW HAMPSHIRER01CA057494 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI KARAGAS, MARGARET RITA · 1993 to 2015
$10.9M
Quantitative Biology Research InstituteP20GM103534 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I. · 2012 to 2016
$8.6M
Bioinformatics Strategies for Genome-Wide Association StudiesR01LM010098 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H., WILLIAMS, SCOTT MATTHEW · 2009 to 2023
$5.1M
Machine Learning Prediction of Cancer SusceptibilityR01LM009012 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2006 to 2014
$3.3M
Bioinformatics Strategies for Multidimensional Brain Imaging GeneticsR01LM011360 · NLM · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOORE, JASON H., SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
Bioinformatics Approaches to Visual Disease GeneticsR01EY022300 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2012 to 2014
$947k
MicroRNA dysregulation and bladder cancer prognosisR21CA182659 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ANDREW, ANGELINE SANDERSON · 2014 to 2015
$388k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA057494NCI NIH HHS R21 CA182659NEI NIH HHS EY022300NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022300NIGMS NIH HHS GM103506NIGMS NIH HHS GM103534NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103506NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103534NLM NIH HHS LM009012NLM NIH HHS LM010098NLM NIH HHS LM011360NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009012NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010098NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-environment (G × E) interactions are biologically important for a wide range of environmental exposures and clinical outcomes. Because of the large number of potential interactions in genomewide association data, the standard approach fits one model per G × E interaction with multiple hypothesis correction (MHC) used to control the type I error rate. Although sometimes effective, using one model per candidate G × E interaction test has two important limitations: low power due to MHC and omitted variable bias. To avoid the coefficient estimation bias associated with independent models, researchers have used penalized regression methods to jointly test all main effects and interactions in a single regression model. Although penalized regression supports joint analysis of all interactions, can be used with hierarchical constraints, and offers excellent predictive performance, it cannot assess the statistical significance of G × E interactions or compute meaningful estimates of effect size. To address the challenge of low power, researchers have separately explored screening-testing, or two-stage, methods in which the set of potential G × E interactions is first filtered and then tested for interactions with MHC only applied to the tests actually performed in the second stage. Although two-stage methods are statistically valid and effective at improving power, they still test multiple separate models and so are impacted by MHC and biased coefficient estimation. To remedy the challenges of both poor power and omitted variable bias encountered with traditional G × E interaction detection methods, we propose a novel approach that combines elements of screening-testing and hierarchical penalized regression. Specifically, our proposed method uses, in the first stage, an elastic net-penalized multiple logistic regression model to jointly estimate either the marginal association filter statistic or the gene-environment correlation filter statistic for all candidate genetic markers. In the second stage, a single multiple logistic regression model is used to jointly assess marginal terms and G × E interactions for all genetic markers that pass the first stage filter. A single likelihood-ratio test is used to determine whether any of the interactions are statistically significant. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method relative to alternative G × E detection methods on a bladder cancer data set.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionLogistic ModelsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenetic MarkersGenetic TestingGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLikelihood FunctionsModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSmokingUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25592580
PMCPMC4299918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.