Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25592566›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2015

Stepwise group sparse regression (SGSR): gene-set-based pharmacogenomic predictive models with stepwise selection of functional priors.

In Sock Jang, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Adam A Margolin, Justin Guinney

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PLATYPUS: A Multiple-View Learning Predictive Framework for Cancer Drug Sensitivity Prediction.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

In Sock JangSage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Ave. N Seattle, WA 98109, USA. in.sock.jang@sagebase.org.
Rodrigo Dienstmann
Adam A Margolin
Justin Guinney
Sage Bionetworks · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Training SubprojectU54HG007990 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI HAUSSLER, DAVID H, PATTERSON, DAVID · 2014 to 2018
$14.8M
Integrating cancer datasets for predictive model development and trainingU54CA149237 · NCI · SAGE BIONETWORKS · PI FRIEND, STEPHEN HENRY · 2010 to 2014
$8.9M
An integrated computational and functional genomics discovery engine for precliniU01CA176303 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI KEMP, CHRISTOPHER J · 2013 to 2016
$4.1M
Validation of prognostic and pathway signatures in lethal prostate cancerU01CA157703 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GLEAVE, MARTIN EDWIN, HALABI, SUSAN · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA157703NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176303NCI NIH HHS U01CA176303NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149237NCI NIH HHS U54CA149237NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG007990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex mechanisms involving genomic aberrations in numerous proteins and pathways are believed to be a key cause of many diseases such as cancer. With recent advances in genomics, elucidating the molecular basis of cancer at a patient level is now feasible, and has led to personalized treatment strategies whereby a patient is treated according to his or her genomic profile. However, there is growing recognition that existing treatment modalities are overly simplistic, and do not fully account for the deep genomic complexity associated with sensitivity or resistance to cancer therapies. To overcome these limitations, large-scale pharmacogenomic screens of cancer cell lines--in conjunction with modern statistical learning approaches--have been used to explore the genetic underpinnings of drug response. While these analyses have demonstrated the ability to infer genetic predictors of compound sensitivity, to date most modeling approaches have been data-driven, i.e. they do not explicitly incorporate domain-specific knowledge (priors) in the process of learning a model. While a purely data-driven approach offers an unbiased perspective of the data--and may yield unexpected or novel insights--this strategy introduces challenges for both model interpretability and accuracy. In this study, we propose a novel prior-incorporated sparse regression model in which the choice of informative predictor sets is carried out by knowledge-driven priors (gene sets) in a stepwise fashion. Under regularization in a linear regression model, our algorithm is able to incorporate prior biological knowledge across the predictive variables thereby improving the interpretability of the final model with no loss--and often an improvement--in predictive performance. We evaluate the performance of our algorithm compared to well-known regularization methods such as LASSO, Ridge and Elastic net regression in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (Sanger) pharmacogenomics datasets, demonstrating that incorporation of the biological priors selected by our model confers improved predictability and interpretability, despite much fewer predictors, over existing state-of-the-art methods.

Indexed as

Linear ModelsAlgorithmsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansModels, GeneticNeoplasmsPharmacogenetics

Identifiers

PMID25592566
PMCPMC4299910
OpenAlexW2053719406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.