Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25592254›Full record

Trial reportReproductive health2015

Safe and efficacious artemisinin-based combination treatments for African pregnant women with malaria: a multicentre randomized control trial.

Michael Nambozi, Modest Mulenga, Tinto Halidou, Harry Tagbor, Victor Mwapasa, Linda Kalilani Phiri, Gertrude Kalanda, Innocent Valea, Maminata Traore, David Mwakazanga and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Four artemisinin-based treatments in African pregnant women with malaria.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2016
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Michael Nambozi
Modest Mulenga
Tinto Halidou
Harry Tagbor
Victor Mwapasa
Linda Kalilani Phiri
Gertrude Kalanda
Innocent Valea
Maminata Traore
David Mwakazanga
Yves Claeys
Céline Schurmans
Maaike De Crop
Joris Menten
Raffaella Ravinetto
Kamala Thriemer
Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden
Theonest Mutabingwa
Umberto D'AlessandroInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium. udalessandro@mrc.gm.
Pregact Group
Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEClinical Research Unit NanoroTropical Diseases Research Centre · ZMUniversity of Malawi · MWHubert Kairuki Memorial University · TZKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHMenzies School of Health Research · AUMRC Unit the Gambia · GMUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsymptomatic and symptomatic malaria during pregnancy has consequences for both mother and her offspring. Unfortunately, there is insufficient information on the safety and efficacy of most antimalarials in pregnancy. Indeed, clinical trials assessing antimalarial treatments systematically exclude pregnancy for fear of teratogenicity and embryotoxicity. The little available information originates from South East Asia while in sub-Saharan Africa such information is still limited and needs to be provided.

designA Phase 3, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomized, open-label clinical trial on safety and efficacy of 4 ACT when administered during pregnancy was carried out in 4 African countries: Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi and Zambia. This is a four arm trial using a balanced incomplete block design. Pregnant women diagnosed with malaria are randomised to receive either amodiaquine-artesunate (AQ-AS), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PQ), artemether-lumefantrine (AL), or mefloquine-artesunate (MQAS). They are actively followed up until day 63 post-treatment and then monthly until 4-6 weeks post-delivery. The offspring is visited at the time of the first birthday. The primary endpoint is treatment failure (PCR adjusted) at day 63 and safety profiles. Secondary endpoints included PCR unadjusted treatment failure up to day 63, gametocyte carriage, Hb changes, placenta malaria, mean birth weight and low birth weight. The primary statistical analysis will use the combined data from all 4 centres, with adjustment for any centre effects, using an additive model for the response rates. This will allow the assessment of all 6 possible pair-wise treatment comparisons using all available data. DISCUSSION: The strength of this trial is the involvement of several African countries, increasing the generalisability of the results. In addition, it assesses most ACTs currently available, determining their relative '-value-' compared to others. The balanced incomplete block design was chosen because using all 4-arms in each site would have increased complexity in terms of implementation. Excluding HIV-positive pregnant women on antiretroviral drugs may be seen as a limitation because of the possible interactions between antiretroviral and antimalarial treatments. Nevertheless, the results of this trial will provide the evidence base for the formulation of malaria treatment policy for pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

AdultAmodiaquineAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsArtesunateBirth WeightBurkina FasoDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFemaleFetal DevelopmentFluorenesFollow-Up StudiesGhanaHumansAmodiaquineamodiaquine, artesunate drug combinationAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsartenimolArtesunateDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluorenesMefloquinepiperaquinePiperazinesQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID25592254
PMCPMC4326323
OpenAlexW2166680147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.