ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2015
Substantia nigra echogenicity in hereditary ataxias with and without nigrostriatal pathology: a pilot study.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The characteristic and biomarker value of transcranial sonography in cerebellar ataxia.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our objective was to determine whether substantia nigra (SN) hyperechogenicity is greater in spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA) with nigrostriatal affectation than in ataxias without it. A cross-sectional case-control study analyzing four groups of patients was conducted: 1) nigrostriatal ataxias (SCA3 and SCA6), 2) nigrostriatal healthy controls matched by age and sex, 3) non-nigrostriatal ataxias (FRDA and SCA7), and 4) non-nigrostriatal healthy controls matched by age and sex. All the patients underwent a transcranial ultrasound performed by an experienced sonographer blinded to the clinical, genetic, and neuroimaging data. The SN area was measured and compared in the four groups. The SN area was also correlated with clinical features and genetic data in the two ataxia groups. We examined 12 patients with nigrostriatal ataxia (11 SCA3 and 1 SCA6), 12 nigrostriatal healthy control patients, 7 patients with non-nigrostriatal ataxia (5 FRDA and 2 SCA7), and 7 non-nigrostriatal healthy control patients. The median (IQR) SN area (cm(2)) was greater in the nigrostriatal ataxias compared with the controls (right SN, 0.43 [0.44] vs. 0.11 [0.25]; P=0.001; left SN, 0.32 [0.25] vs. 0.11 [0.16]; P=0.001), but was similar among the non-nigrostriatal ataxias and controls. There were no statistically significant differences in the SN area between the nigrostriatal and non-nigrostriatal ataxias, although there was a tendency for a greater left SN area in the nigrostriatal compared with the non-nigrostriatal ataxias (0.32 [0.25] vs. 0.16 [0.24], P=0.083). SN echogenicity is markedly greater in ataxias with nigrostriatal pathology than in controls. The role of SN hyperechogenicity in differentiating ataxias with and without nigrostriatal pathology should be elucidated in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.