Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25591901›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2015

[Vernal keratoconjunctivitis].

U Pleyer, A Leonardi

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

U PleyerAugenklinik, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland, uwe.pleyer@charite.de.
A Leonardi
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a bilateral, usually seasonally recurrent inflammation of the conjunctiva. Clinically characteristic findings are tarsal giant conjunctival papillae (> 1 mm) and/or limbal gelatinous changes (Trantas dots). The underlying etiology and pathophysiology of VKC remains unclear; however, clinical findings and immunohistochemical studies suggest a complex, both IgE-dependent and IgE-independent immune-mediated etiology. Several predisposing conditions include endocrine, genetic, neurogenic, environmental and socioeconomic risk factors. Mast cell stabilizers, antihistamines and topical corticosteroids are often used during acute flare-ups in VKC; however this approach is unsatisfactory for controlling severe cases and avoiding recurrences. Immunomodulatory agents, such as cyclosporin A and tacrolimus are promising alternative agents for long-term management. In most children the clinical course of VKC is self-limiting and may disappear following puberty; however, some VKC patients will face sight-threatening complications which are mainly due to corneal involvement and iatrogenic damage caused by prolonged corticosteroid treatment.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsConjunctivitis, AllergicEvidence-Based MedicineHistamine AntagonistsHumansImmunologic FactorsTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsHistamine AntagonistsImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID25591901
OpenAlexW3193028236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.