Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25591755›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2015

Renal denervation decreases effective refractory period but not inducibility of ventricular fibrillation in a healthy porcine biomodel: a case control study.

Jean-Claude Lubanda, Jaroslav Kudlicka, Mikulas Mlcek, Miroslav Chochola, Petr Neuzil, Ales Linhart, Otomar Kittnar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Renal denervation for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias: data from an International Multicenter Registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Claude Lubanda2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic. jean-claude.lubanda@vfn.cz.
Jaroslav KudlickaInstitute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 5, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic. jaroslav.kudlicka@vfn.cz.
Mikulas MlcekInstitute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 5, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic. mikulas.mlcek@staff.cuni.cz.
Miroslav Chochola2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic. miroslav.chochola@vfn.cz.
Petr NeuzilDepartment of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2/37, Prague 5, 150 30, Czech Republic. pneuzil@seznam.cz.
Ales Linhart2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic. ales.linhart@vfn.cz.
Otomar KittnarInstitute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 5, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic. otomar.kittnar@lf1.cuni.cz.
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physiology · CZNa Homolce Hospital · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentricular arrhythmias play an important role in cardiovascular mortality especially in patients with impaired cardiac and autonomic function. The aim of this experimental study was to determine, if renal denervation (RDN) could decrease the inducibility of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in a healthy porcine biomodel.

methodsControlled electrophysiological study was performed in 6 biomodels 40 days after RDN (RDN group) and in 6 healthy animals (control group). The inducibility of VF was tested by programmed ventricular stimulation from the apex of right ventricle (8 basal stimuli coupled with up to 4 extrastimuli) always three times in each biomodel using peripheral extracorporeal oxygenation for hemodynamic support. Further, basal heart rate (HR), PQ and QT intervals and effective refractory period of ventricles (ERP) were measured. Technical success of RDN was evaluated by histological examination.

resultsAccording to histological findings, RDN procedure was successfully performed in all biomodels. Comparing the groups, basal HR was lower in RDN group: 79 (IQR 58; 88) vs. 93 (72; 95) beats per minute (p = 0.003); PQ interval was longer in RDN group: 145 (133; 153) vs. 115 (113; 120) ms (p < 0.0001) and QTc intervals were comparable: 402 (382; 422) ms in RDN vs. 386 (356; 437) ms in control group (p = 0.1). ERP was prolonged significantly in RDN group: 159 (150; 169) vs. 140 (133; 150) ms (p = 0.001), but VF inducibility was the same (18/18 vs. 18/18 attempts).

conclusionsRDN decreased the influence of sympathetic nerve system on the heart conduction system in healthy porcine biomodel. However, the electrophysiological study was not associated with a decrease of VF inducibility after RDN.

Indexed as

DenervationRefractory Period, ElectrophysiologicalAnimalsCase-Control StudiesDisease Models, AnimalElectrocardiographyKidneyRenal ArterySus scrofaUltrasonographyVentricular Fibrillation

Identifiers

PMID25591755
PMCPMC4300561
OpenAlexW2168490214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.