Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25591484›Full record

ReviewBrain research2015

Do slow and fast gamma rhythms correspond to distinct functional states in the hippocampal network?

Laura Lee Colgin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Spectral dependence as a framework for neural coordination.Current research in neurobiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Theta Oscillons in Behaving Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dynamic switching of neural oscillations in the prefrontal-amygdala circuit for naturalistic freeze-or-flight.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Laura Lee ColginCenter for Learning and Memory, Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station Stop C7000, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Electronic address: colgin@mail.clm.utexas.edu.

Funding

Understanding the roles of slow and fast gamma rhythms in memory processingR01MH102450 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI COLGIN, LAURA L · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, hippocampal gamma was thought to be a single type of rhythm with a continuously varying frequency. However, an increasing body of evidence supports a new hypothesis regarding hippocampal gamma. The patterns traditionally defined as hippocampal gamma may actually comprise separate gamma subtypes with distinct frequencies and unique functions. The present review discusses the evidence for and against this new viewpoint. This review will also point out key questions that remain to be answered to validate the two-gamma hypothesis. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Brain and Memory.

Indexed as

Gamma RhythmAnimalsHippocampusHumansMemoryNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSleepTheta RhythmEntorhinal cortexGammaHippocampusOscillationsRhythms

Identifiers

PMID25591484
PMCPMC4499490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.