Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25591483›Full record

ReviewBrain research2015

Repair of spinal cord injury with neuronal relays: From fetal grafts to neural stem cells.

Joseph F Bonner, Oswald Steward

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. In vivo cell fate reprogramming for spinal cord repair.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Challenges in Translating Regenerative Therapies for Spinal Cord Injury.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neuronal reprogramming in treating spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cell transplantation to repair the injured spinal cord.International review of neurobiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph F BonnerReeve-Irvine Research Center, University of California, 1105 Gillespie Neuroscience Research Facility, Irvine, CA 92697-4265, USA. Electronic address: jfbonner@uci.edu.
Oswald StewardReeve-Irvine Research Center, University of California, 1105 Gillespie Neuroscience Research Facility, Irvine, CA 92697-4265, USA; Departments of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Neurobiology & Behavior, and Neurosurgery, University of California at Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA 92697-4265, USA.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Respiratory Motor Neuron Protection Following Cervical Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS079702 · NINDS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI Angelo C. Lepore · 2013 to 2026
$6.0M
Towards a therapy to regenerate corticospinal axonsR01NS073857 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI STEWARD, OSWALD · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS #1R01NS079702NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts the long axonal tracts of the spinal cord leading to devastating loss of function. Cell transplantation in the injured spinal cord has the potential to lead to recovery after SCI via a variety of mechanisms. One such strategy is the formation of neuronal relays between injured long tract axons and denervated neurons. The idea of creating a neuronal relay was first proposed over 25 years ago when fetal tissue was first successfully transplanted into the injured rodent spinal cord. Advances in labeling of grafted cells and the development of neural stem cell culturing techniques have improved the ability to create and refine such relays. Several recent studies have examined the ability to create a novel neuronal circuit between injured axons and denervated targets. This approach is an alternative to long-distance regeneration of damaged axons that may provide a meaningful degree of recovery without direct recreation of lost pathways. This brief review will examine the contribution of fetal grafting to current advances in neuronal grafting. Of particular interest will be the ability of transplanted neurons derived from fetal grafts, neural precursor cells and neural stem cells to reconnect long distance motor and sensory pathways of the injured spinal cord. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsGraft SurvivalHumansNeural Stem CellsNeuronsSpinal Cord InjuriesSynaptic TransmissionFetal graftNeural progenitor cellsNeural stem cellsNeuronal relaySpinal cord InjuryTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID25591483
PMCPMC4499497
OpenAlexW2081502532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.