Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25591000›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2014

Isolation and intravenous injection of murine bone marrow derived monocytes.

Martin Wagner, Helen Koester, Christian Deffge, Soenke Weinert, Johannes Lauf, Alexander Francke, Jerry Lee, R C Braun-Dullaeus, Joerg Herold

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A backpack-based myeloid cell therapy for multiple sclerosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martin WagnerDepartment for Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg.
Helen KoesterDepartment for Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg.
Christian DeffgeDepartment for Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg.
Soenke WeinertDepartment for Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg.
Johannes LaufDepartment for Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg.
Alexander FranckeHerzzentrum Dresden, Universitätsklinikum an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden.
Jerry LeeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge.
R C Braun-DullaeusDepartment for Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg.
Joerg HeroldDepartment for Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg; joerg.herold@med.ovgu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a subtype of leukocytes and progenitors of macrophages, monocytes are involved in many important processes of organisms and are often the subject of various fields in biomedical science. The method described below is a simple and effective way to isolate murine monocytes from heterogeneous bone marrow. Bone marrow from the femur and tibia of Balb/c mice is harvested by flushing with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Cell suspension is supplemented with macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) and cultured on ultra-low attachment surfaces to avoid adhesion-triggered differentiation of monocytes. The properties and differentiation of monocytes are characterized at various intervals. Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), with markers like CD11b, CD115, and F4/80, is used for phenotyping. At the end of cultivation, the suspension consists of 45%± 12% monocytes. By removing adhesive macrophages, the purity can be raised up to 86%± 6%. After the isolation, monocytes can be utilized in various ways, and one of the most effective and common methods for in vivo delivery is intravenous tail vein injection. This technique of isolation and application is important for mouse model studies, especially in the fields of inflammation or immunology. Monocytes can also be used therapeutically in mouse disease models.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell SeparationCytological TechniquesFemurMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMonocytesTibia

Identifiers

PMID25591000
PMCPMC4354490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.