Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25590846›Full record

ArticleMedicine2015

Establishment and validation of ALPH-Q score to predict mortality risk in patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure: a prospective cohort study.

Sheng-Jie Wu, Hua-Dong Yan, Zai-Xing Zheng, Ke-Qing Shi, Fa-Ling Wu, Yao-Yao Xie, Yu-Chen Fan, Bo-Zhi Ye, Wei-Jian Huang, Yong-Ping Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Research progress in prognostic factors of hepatitis B virus-associated end-stage liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sheng-Jie WuFrom the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (S-JW, Z-XZ, B-ZY, W-JH), the Heart Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou; Department of Infectious Diseases (H-DY), Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo; Department of Infection and Liver Diseases (K-QS, F-LW, Y-PC, M-HZ), Liver Research Center (K-QS, F-LW, Y-PC, M-HZ), the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University; Institute of Hepatology, Wenzhou Medical University; Department of Clinical Laboratory (Y-YX), the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou; Department of Hepatology (Y-CF), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Hua-Dong Yan
Zai-Xing Zheng
Ke-Qing Shi
Fa-Ling Wu
Yao-Yao Xie
Yu-Chen Fan
Bo-Zhi Ye
Wei-Jian Huang
Yong-Ping Chen
Ming-Hua Zheng

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there are no robust models for predicting the outcome of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure (ACHBLF). We aimed to establish and validate a new prognostic scoring system, named ALPH-Q, that integrates electrocardiography parameters that may be used to predict short-term mortality of patients with ACHBLF. Two hundred fourteen patients were included in this study. The APLH-Q score was constructed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis and was validated in an independent patient cohort. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to compare the performance of different models, including APLH-Q, Child-Pugh score (CPS), model of end-stage liver disease (MELD), and a previously reported logistic regression model (LRM). The APLH-Q score was constructed with 5 independent risk factors, including age (HR = 1.034, 95% CI: 1.007-1.061), liver cirrhosis (HR = 2.753, 95% CI: 1.366-5.548), prothrombin time (HR = 1.031, 95% CI: 1.002-1.062), hepatic encephalopathy (HR = 2.703, 95% CI: 1.630-4.480), and QTc (HR = 1.008, 95% CI: 1.001-1.016). The performance of the ALPH-Q score was significantly better than that of MELD and CPS in both the training (0.896 vs 0.712, 0.896 vs 0.738, respectively, both P < 0.05) and validation cohorts (0.837 vs 0.689, 0.837 vs 0.585, respectively, both P < 0.05). Compared with LRM, APLH-Q also showed a better performance (0.896 vs 0.825, 0.837 vs 0.818, respectively).We have developed a novel APLH-Q score with greater performance than CPS, MELD, and LRM for predicting short-term mortality of patients with ACHBLF.

Indexed as

Acute-On-Chronic Liver FailureAdultChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHepatitis B, ChronicHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID25590846
PMCPMC4602548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.