Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25590805›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2015

Targeting heat-shock protein 90 with ganetespib for molecularly targeted therapy of gastric cancer.

H Liu, J Lu, Y Hua, P Zhang, Z Liang, L Ruan, C Lian, H Shi, K Chen, Z Tu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of proteomics investigations on gastric cancer treatment and diagnosis.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H LiuSchool of Pharmacy, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China.ORCID 0000000179846305
J LuSchool of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China.
Y HuaInstitute of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China.
P ZhangSchool of Pharmacy, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China.
Z LiangSchool of Pharmacy, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China.
L RuanSchool of Pharmacy, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China.
C LianInstitute of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China.
H ShiInstitute of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China.
K ChenInstitute of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China.
Z TuInstitute of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China.ORCID 0000000198443245
Jiangsu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) remains the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Heat-shock protein 90 (HSP90) has become an attractive therapeutic target in treating cancers, because of its abnormally high expression in cancers. Several successful cases of HSP90 inhibitors capable of inhibiting GC inspired us to try ganetespib, a clinically promising and actively investigated second-generation HSP90 inhibitor in GC treatment. In our study, we show that ganetespib markedly reduced the growth of MGC-803 and also significantly inhibited the growth of SGC-7901 and MKN-28 in a dose-dependent manner. It induced G2/M cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in all three cell lines, together with the related markers affected significantly. Mechanistically, ganetespib caused pronounced decrease of expression of classic HSP90 client proteins. Specifically, it greatly affected epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling cascades by markedly decreasing the levels of total EGFR and EGFR on cell membranes. EGFR knockdown also induced cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis accompanied with a decrease of several EGFR downstream proteins. These results strongly support that EGFR signaling greatly contributes to the ganetespib inhibitory effects. Besides, we found that the responses of GC cell lines to ganetespib correlated well with their EGFR expression levels: MGC-803, as well as AGS and BGC-803, with higher EGFR expression responded to ganetespib better, whereas SGC-7901 and MKN-28 with lower EGFR levels were much less sensitive to ganetespib. Although SGC-7901 and MKN-28 were not very sensitive to ganetespib, ganetespib worked synergistically with radiation and cisplatin in killing them. Importantly, ganetespib significantly inhibited the growth of xenograft tumors in vivo as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin. Results of hematoxylin/eosin staining, TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling) assays, and immunohistochemistry staining of phosphorylated cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (pCDK1), EGFR and Ki-67 revealed significant differences in ganetespib-treated tumors. Collectively, our data suggest that ganetespib, as a new potent treatment option, can be used for the molecularly targeted therapy of GC patients according to their expression profiles of EGFR.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsApoptosisCell Cycle CheckpointsCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCisplatinErbB ReceptorsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansMice, NudeRadiation ToleranceRNA, Small InterferingSignal TransductionCisplatinErbB ReceptorsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsRNA, Small InterferingSTA 9090Triazoles

Identifiers

PMID25590805
PMCPMC4669753
OpenAlexW1976681308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.