Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25590638›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Household costs of leprosy reactions (ENL) in rural India.

David J Chandler, Kristian S Hansen, Bhabananda Mahato, Joydeepa Darlong, Annamma John, Diana N J Lockwood

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03775460 (Methotrexate and Prednisolone Study in Erythema Nodosum Leprosum), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03775460 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Methotrexate and Prednisolone Study in Erythema Nodosum Leprosum (MaPS in ENL

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2023 to 2025Enrolled550ConditionsErythema Nodosum LeprosumArmsMethotrexate, Placebo, Prednisolone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Leprosy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cost-effectiveness of incorporatingThe Indian journal of medical research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David J ChandlerDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Kristian S HansenDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Bhabananda MahatoThe Leprosy Mission Home and Hospital, Purulia, West Bengal, India.
Joydeepa DarlongThe Leprosy Mission Home and Hospital, Purulia, West Bengal, India.
Annamma JohnThe Leprosy Mission Trust India, New Delhi, India.
Diana N J LockwoodDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBRamakrishna Mission Vidyamandira · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundErythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) is a common immune-mediated complication of lepromatous (LL) and borderline lepromatous (BL) leprosy. Most patients experience chronic or multiple acute ENL over many years during an economically active period of their lives. Understanding the economic burden of ENL is essential to provide effective patient support, yet this area has not been investigated.

methodsNinety-one patients with LL or BL leprosy attending a leprosy hospital in Purulia district of West Bengal, India, were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Cases (n = 53) were identified as those who had one or more episodes of ENL within the last 3 years. Controls (n = 38) had LL or BL leprosy but no history of ENL. Data were collected on household income, direct and indirect costs, and coping strategies.

findingsThe total household cost was Rs 1543 per month or 27.9% (IQR 13.2-52.6) of monthly household income for cases, and Rs 237 per month or 4.9% (IQR 1.7-13.4) of monthly household income for controls. Indirect costs accounted for 65% of total household costs for cases. Direct costs accounted for the remaining 35% of household costs, and resulted almost entirely from treatment-seeking in the private sector. Total household costs exceeded 40% of household income for 37.7% of cases (n = 20) and 2.6% of controls (n = 1) [1 USD = 59 INR].

interpretationHouseholds affected by ENL face significant economic burden and are at risk of being pushed further into poverty. Health policy should acknowledge the importance of private sector provision and the significant contribution to total household costs of lost productivity (indirect cost). Further work is needed to explore this area and identify solutions.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdultErythema NodosumFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansIncomeIndiaLeprostatic AgentsLeprosy, BorderlineLeprosy, LepromatousMalePovertyLeprostatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25590638
PMCPMC4295874
OpenAlexW2023219615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.