Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25590466›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The diagnostic value of clinical symptoms in women and men presenting with chest pain at the emergency department, a prospective cohort study.

Manon G van der Meer, Barbra E Backus, Yolanda van der Graaf, Maarten J Cramer, Yolande Appelman, Pieter A Doevendans, A Jacob Six, Hendrik M Nathoe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manon G van der MeerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Barbra E BackusDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Yolanda van der GraafJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Maarten J CramerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Yolande AppelmanDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Pieter A DoevendansDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
A Jacob SixDepartment of Cardiology, Zuwe Hofpoort hospital, Woerden, the Netherlands.
Hendrik M NathoeDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies suggested that diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) is more difficult in women than in men. Studies investigating the predictive value of clinical signs and symptoms and compare its combined diagnostic value between women and men are lacking. METHODOLOGY: Data from a large multicenter prospective study was used. Patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain but without ST-elevation were eligible. The endpoint was proven CAD, defined as a significant stenosis at angiography or the diagnosis of a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death within six weeks after presentation at the ED. Twelve clinical symptoms and seven cardiovascular risk factors were collected. Potential predictors of CAD with a p-value <0.15 in the univariable analysis were included in a multivariable model. The diagnostic value of clinical symptoms and cardiovascular risk factors was quantified in women and men separately and areas under the curve (AUC) were compared between sexes.

resultsA total of 2433 patients were included. We excluded 102 patients (4%) with either an incomplete follow up or ST-elevation. Of the remaining 2331 patients 43% (1003) were women. CAD was present in 111 (11%) women and 278 (21%) men. In women 11 out of 12 and in men 10 out of 12 clinical symptoms were univariably associated with CAD. The AUC of symptoms alone was 0.74 (95%CI: 0.69-0.79) in women and 0.71 (95%CI: 0.68-0.75) in men and increased to respectively 0.79 (95%CI: 0.74-0.83) in women versus 0.75 (95%CI: 0.72-0.78) in men after adding cardiovascular risk factors. The AUCs of women and men were not significantly different (p-value symptoms alone: 0.45, after adding cardiovascular risk factors: 0.11).

conclusionThe diagnostic value of clinical symptoms and cardiovascular risk factors for the diagnosis of CAD in chest pain patients presenting on the ED was high in women and men. No significant differences were found between sexes.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesChest PainCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSymptom Assessment

Identifiers

PMID25590466
PMCPMC4295862
OpenAlexW2004961630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.