Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25590394›Full record

ArticleRadiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc

Ontology-based image navigation: exploring 3.0-T MR neurography of the brachial plexus using AIM and RadLex.

Kenneth C Wang, Aditya R Salunkhe, James J Morrison, Pearlene P Lee, José L V Mejino, Landon T Detwiler, James F Brinkley, Eliot L Siegel, Daniel L Rubin, John A Carrino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Magnetic resonance neurography of the brachial plexus.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth C WangFrom the Imaging Service, Baltimore VA Medical Center, 10 N Greene St, Room C1-24, Baltimore, MD 21201 (K.C.W., E.L.S.); Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (K.C.W., P.P.L.); Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Md (A.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (J.J.M., E.L.S.); Departments of Biological Structure (J.L.V.M., L.T.D., J.F.B.) and Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education (L.T.D., J.F.B.), University of Washington, Seattle, Wash; Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (D.L.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY (J.A.C.).
Aditya R Salunkhe
James J Morrison
Pearlene P Lee
José L V Mejino
Landon T Detwiler
James F Brinkley
Eliot L Siegel
Daniel L Rubin
John A Carrino
University of Washington · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · USBaltimore VA Medical Center · USHospital for Special Surgery · USStanford University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

NIBIB NIH HHS HHSN268200800020C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disorders of the peripheral nervous system have traditionally been evaluated using clinical history, physical examination, and electrodiagnostic testing. In selected cases, imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance (MR) neurography may help further localize or characterize abnormalities associated with peripheral neuropathies, and the clinical importance of such techniques is increasing. However, MR image interpretation with respect to peripheral nerve anatomy and disease often presents a diagnostic challenge because the relevant knowledge base remains relatively specialized. Using the radiology knowledge resource RadLex®, a series of RadLex queries, the Annotation and Image Markup standard for image annotation, and a Web services-based software architecture, the authors developed an application that allows ontology-assisted image navigation. The application provides an image browsing interface, allowing users to visually inspect the imaging appearance of anatomic structures. By interacting directly with the images, users can access additional structure-related information that is derived from RadLex (eg, muscle innervation, muscle attachment sites). These data also serve as conceptual links to navigate from one portion of the imaging atlas to another. With 3.0-T MR neurography of the brachial plexus as the initial area of interest, the resulting application provides support to radiologists in the image interpretation process by allowing efficient exploration of the MR imaging appearance of relevant nerve segments, muscles, bone structures, vascular landmarks, anatomic spaces, and entrapment sites, and the investigation of neuromuscular relationships.

Indexed as

Atlases as TopicBrachial Plexus NeuropathiesHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedInternetMagnetic Resonance ImagingSoftware

Identifiers

PMID25590394
PMCPMC4319494
OpenAlexW1983109327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.