Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25590345›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2014

The use of the puzzle box as a means of assessing the efficacy of environmental enrichment.

Angela M O'Connor, Thomas J Burton, Catherine A Leamey, Atomu Sawatari

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biochemical, biomarker, and behavioral characterization of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. iScience · 2022
    Article
  12. Problem Solving in Animals: Proposal for an Ontogenetic Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  13. The development of a cognitive rehabilitation task for mice.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Effects of Various Commercially Available Enrichment Options on Handling and Chronic Stress Markers in Female ICR Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela M O'ConnorDiscipline of Physiology, University of Sydney.
Thomas J BurtonDiscipline of Physiology, University of Sydney; Bosch Animal Behavioural Facility, University of Sydney.
Catherine A LeameyDiscipline of Physiology, University of Sydney.
Atomu SawatariDiscipline of Physiology, University of Sydney; atomu@medsci.usyd.edu.au.
University of Sydney · AURobert Bosch (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental enrichment can dramatically influence the development and function of neural circuits. Further, enrichment has been shown to successfully delay the onset of symptoms in models of Huntington's disease (1-4), suggesting environmental factors can evoke a neuroprotective effect against the progressive, cellular level damage observed in neurodegenerative disorders. The ways in which an animal can be environmentally enriched, however, can vary considerably. Further, there is no straightforward manner in which the effects of environmental enrichment can be assessed: most methods require either fairly complicated behavioral paradigms and/or postmortem anatomical/physiological analyses. This protocol describes the use of a simple and inexpensive behavioral assay, the Puzzle Box (5-7) as a robust means of determining the efficacy of increased social, sensory and motor stimulation on mice compared to cohorts raised in standard laboratory conditions. This simple problem solving task takes advantage of a rodent's innate desire to avoid open enclosures by seeking shelter. Cognitive ability is assessed by adding increasingly complex impediments to the shelter's entrance. The time a given subject takes to successfully remove the obstructions and enter the shelter serves as the primary metric for task performance. This method could provide a reliable means of rapidly assessing the efficacy of different enrichment protocols on cognitive function, thus paving the way for systematically determining the role specific environmental factors play in delaying the onset of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disease.

Indexed as

Housing, AnimalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCognitionCognition DisordersFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPregnancyProblem SolvingRandom Allocation

Identifiers

PMID25590345
PMCPMC4354494
OpenAlexW2160032847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.