Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25590331›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2015

Uptake and population-level impact of expedited partner therapy (EPT) on Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: the Washington State community-level randomized trial of EPT.

Matthew R Golden, Roxanne P Kerani, Mark Stenger, James P Hughes, Mark Aubin, Cheryl Malinski, King K Holmes

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01665690 phase4completednot on this map

A Community-level RCT of Expedited Partner Treatment for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2007 to 2011Enrolled33,222ConditionsGonorrhea, Neisseria Gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia TrachomatisArmsPatient delivered partner therapy, Targeted public health partner services
NCT03135067 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Secondary Distribution of HIV Self-tests: an Innovative Strategy for Promoting Partner Testing and Reducing HIV Risk

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2017 to 2020Enrolled2,102ConditionsHuman Immunodeficiency VirusArmsProvision of multiple self-tests
NCT04797858 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Secondary Distribution of COVID-19 Self-tests vs. Referrals to Increase Test Uptake in Underserved Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled792ConditionsCovid19ArmsCOVID-19 self-test, COVID-19 test referral
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Evaluating a new partner management strategy for bacterial sexually transmitted infections after a change in 2020 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2017 to 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Generalizing the information content for stepped wedge designs: A marginal modeling approach.Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew R GoldenCenter for AIDS and STD,, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Public Health-Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Roxanne P KeraniCenter for AIDS and STD,, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Public Health-Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Mark StengerWashington State Department of Health, Olympia, Washington, United States of America.
James P HughesCenter for AIDS and STD,, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Mark AubinWashington State Department of Health, Olympia, Washington, United States of America.
Cheryl MalinskiCenter for AIDS and STD,, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
King K HolmesCenter for AIDS and STD,, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Public Health – Seattle & King County · USUniversity of Washington · USWashington State Department of Health · USAIDS United · US

Funding

A community-level RCT of expedited partner treatment for gonorrhea and chlamydiaR01AI068107 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GOLDEN, MATTHEW R · 2006 to 2010
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068107NIAID NIH HHS R01AI068107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpedited partner therapy (EPT), the practice of treating the sex partners of persons with sexually transmitted infections without their medical evaluation, increases partner treatment and decreases gonorrhea and chlamydia reinfection rates. We conducted a stepped-wedge, community-level randomized trial to determine whether a public health intervention promoting EPT could increase its use and decrease chlamydia test positivity and gonorrhea incidence in women. METHODS AND

findingsThe trial randomly assigned local health jurisdictions (LHJs) in Washington State, US, into four study waves. Waves instituted the intervention in randomly assigned order at intervals of 6-8 mo. Of the state's 25 LHJs, 24 were eligible and 23 participated. Heterosexual individuals with gonorrhea or chlamydial infection were eligible for the intervention. The study made free patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) available to clinicians, and provided public health partner services based on clinician referral. The main study outcomes were chlamydia test positivity among women ages 14-25 y in 219 sentinel clinics, and incidence of reported gonorrhea in women, both measured at the community level. Receipt of PDPT from clinicians was evaluated among randomly selected patients. 23 and 22 LHJs provided data on gonorrhea and chlamydia outcomes, respectively. The intervention increased the percentage of persons receiving PDPT from clinicians (from 18% to 34%, p < 0.001) and the percentage receiving partner services (from 25% to 45%, p < 0.001). Chlamydia test positivity and gonorrhea incidence in women decreased over the study period, from 8.2% to 6.5% and from 59.6 to 26.4 per 100,000, respectively. After adjusting for temporal trends, the intervention was associated with an approximately 10% reduction in both chlamydia positivity and gonorrhea incidence, though the confidence bounds on these outcomes both crossed one (chlamydia positivity prevalence ratio = 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.04, p = 0.15; gonorrhea incidence rate ratio = 0.91, 95% CI .71-1.16, p = 0.45). Study findings were potentially limited by inadequate statistical power, by the institution of some aspects of the study intervention outside of the research randomization sequence, and by the fact that LHJs did not constitute truly isolated sexual networks.

conclusionsA public health intervention promoting the use of free PDPT substantially increased its use and may have resulted in decreased chlamydial and gonococcal infections at the population level.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01665690.

Indexed as

Contact TracingSexual PartnersAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisFemaleGonorrheaHeterosexualityHumansNeisseria gonorrhoeaePrevalenceSexually Transmitted DiseasesWashingtonYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25590331
PMCPMC4295847
OpenAlexW2038017441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.