Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25590220›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2015

Nutritional outcomes with implementation of probiotics in preterm infants.

S Dang, L Shook, K Garlitz, M Hanna, N Desai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Probiotics and necrotizing enterocolitis.Seminars in pediatric surgery · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S DangDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
L ShookDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
K GarlitzDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
M HannaDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
N DesaiDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess nutritional outcomes in preterm infants after the implementation of probiotics. STUDY

designRetrospective chart review of infants with birth weight⩽1250 grams and/or⩽28 weeks of gestational age admitted to the KCH-Neonatal Intensive Care Unit was done. Data were collected over two periods, period 1 (before probiotics) and period 2 (after probiotics) and included demographic data, daily weight gain, feeding strategies (type, amount, caloric content and frequency of feeds) and comorbidities affecting feedings (Patent ductus arteriosus, Sepsis). Primary outcomes-extra uterine growth restriction (EUGR) status and incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) as well as secondary outcomes-time to reach full feeds, feeding intolerance episodes and weight gain were compared between the two groups.

resultsA total of 113 infants (period 1) were compared with 108 infants (period 2). The odds of EUGR was significantly lower with probiotics (odds ratio: 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.138 to 0.611). Time to reach full feeds was significantly reduced and weight gain was significantly better in period 2. Significant reduction was also noted in number of total parental nutrition days, central line days, nil per os days and number of feeding intolerance episodes in period 2. There was no significant difference in the incidence of NEC.

conclusionProbiotics improve feeding tolerance leading to better overall growth and decreases the incidence of EUGR in preterm infants.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureProbioticsWeight GainEnteral NutritionEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFemaleHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25590220
OpenAlexW2024503234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.