Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25590141›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Inference of quantitative models of bacterial promoters from time-series reporter gene data.

Diana Stefan, Corinne Pinel, Stéphane Pinhal, Eugenio Cinquemani, Johannes Geiselmann, Hidde de Jong

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gene transcription in bursting: a unified mode for realizing accuracy and stochasticity.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Dynamic Modeling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diana StefanINRIA Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes, Grenoble, France; Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique (LIPhy, CNRS UMR 5588), Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France.
Corinne PinelINRIA Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes, Grenoble, France; Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique (LIPhy, CNRS UMR 5588), Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France.
Stéphane PinhalINRIA Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes, Grenoble, France; Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique (LIPhy, CNRS UMR 5588), Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France.
Eugenio CinquemaniINRIA Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Johannes GeiselmannINRIA Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes, Grenoble, France; Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique (LIPhy, CNRS UMR 5588), Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France.
Hidde de JongINRIA Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique · FRInstitut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inference of regulatory interactions and quantitative models of gene regulation from time-series transcriptomics data has been extensively studied and applied to a range of problems in drug discovery, cancer research, and biotechnology. The application of existing methods is commonly based on implicit assumptions on the biological processes under study. First, the measurements of mRNA abundance obtained in transcriptomics experiments are taken to be representative of protein concentrations. Second, the observed changes in gene expression are assumed to be solely due to transcription factors and other specific regulators, while changes in the activity of the gene expression machinery and other global physiological effects are neglected. While convenient in practice, these assumptions are often not valid and bias the reverse engineering process. Here we systematically investigate, using a combination of models and experiments, the importance of this bias and possible corrections. We measure in real time and in vivo the activity of genes involved in the FliA-FlgM module of the E. coli motility network. From these data, we estimate protein concentrations and global physiological effects by means of kinetic models of gene expression. Our results indicate that correcting for the bias of commonly-made assumptions improves the quality of the models inferred from the data. Moreover, we show by simulation that these improvements are expected to be even stronger for systems in which protein concentrations have longer half-lives and the activity of the gene expression machinery varies more strongly across conditions than in the FliA-FlgM module. The approach proposed in this study is broadly applicable when using time-series transcriptome data to learn about the structure and dynamics of regulatory networks. In the case of the FliA-FlgM module, our results demonstrate the importance of global physiological effects and the active regulation of FliA and FlgM half-lives for the dynamics of FliA-dependent promoters.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, MessengerSigma FactorTranscription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsFlgM protein, BacteriaFliA protein, BacteriaGreen Fluorescent ProteinsRNA, MessengerSigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID25590141
PMCPMC4295839
OpenAlexW1992009029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.